AmericanLongRifles Forums

General discussion => Gun Building => Topic started by: cal.43 on November 19, 2010, 10:13:20 AM

Title: rear entry timble?
Post by: cal.43 on November 19, 2010, 10:13:20 AM
(https://americanlongrifles.org/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi281.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fkk212%2Fejgibby1%2Ffowler5.jpg&hash=d494cf345f527140f73f162bafbef2117cae8ba4)
saw this picture, now my question was it a typicall way to make the rearentry timble as a two piece.
sorry for my bad english.
Regards
Arne
Title: Re: rear entry timble?
Post by: Long John on November 19, 2010, 03:48:35 PM
Arne,

I'm no expert but it is my impression that it was not uncommon to use solder as seen in your picture.  I have done it myself on a Bucks County rifle.  However, we don't know what happened to that gun over the past 200 years.  It might have had a one-piece entry pipe that was damaged and in reparing the gun the repair was made by merely soldering on a replacement extension, which later fell off.  Clearly, from the wear on the entry pipe, the gun has been used for a long time with the extension missing.

Best Regards,

JMC
Title: Re: rear entry timble?
Post by: Dave B on November 19, 2010, 05:15:24 PM
It is interesting  that lately I have seen several of these on various originals.  I think that it was not done as much as the traditional one piece but may have been more  typical to a particular school of building
Title: Re: rear entry timble?
Post by: Dphariss on November 19, 2010, 05:27:01 PM
I have done this but use silver solder.  Solder together store bought pipes are one reason I make my own.
I prefer to make them one piece its little more trouble and I think its easier to make a fancy one in one piece.

Dan
Title: Re: rear entry timble?
Post by: James Rogers on November 19, 2010, 05:36:50 PM
I believe there are quite  few 18th century American examples in Grinslade's fowling piece book and I have also seen English two-piece examples as well.
Title: Re: rear entry timble?
Post by: cal.43 on November 23, 2010, 06:34:29 PM
thanks for the info.