Ah ,the ignorance of the average 'Touron'.A reenactor term for 'tourist/moron'
that being said, People still think in 21st. cent. terms what is proper or indecent.They are coming to judgements using a modern mindset.
As a F&I French habitant it was common for men to go work in the fields wearing
but their shirts. That was expected, Most adult white males wore a shirt.If you did not, THAT was INDECENT.
If a woman's elbows or shoulders were showing,or her head was uncovered, that was INDECENT. But it did not matter if most of her cleavage was ready to bust out of her stays or jump, or if she wore her petticoats to below her knee's Cause tofor a lady to show her knee's in public was INDECENT.
In a period native camp children would not even wear any kind of bottoms,I suppose it was indecent to someone.
As stated all NA people do not care to portray themselves as they were 250 yrs. ago. Those that do portray it very well.As for white guys doing it?Does the term "captive" mean anything? Also those that do do it well, Spending great pains in time , reseach & money for their interpretation. In the late 18th century there were many assimilated people in the Delaware tribes. I forget the exact numbers.There are many captivity stories for the reading. i enjoys reading those very much,
And for the record: I prefer a brayette/breechclout over breeches most days of the year, :)Snowy winter months are the exception though.
Oh yeah, I know native reenactors that wear a brayette all year round ;)That is PC
Enough of my rambling thoughts, Alex... Soon to be in Fortress Louisborg, wearing breeches like a civilized habitant, along with his wife who will have her head, shoulders & elbows & knee's covered
OOPs, I have skin showing!How indecent of me....