Author Topic: Roger Sells on blog  (Read 4928 times)

Offline heinz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1158
Roger Sells on blog
« on: August 11, 2011, 04:29:22 PM »
Very elegant Sells southern mountainrifle on the contemporary makers blog today.  Well worth a look.
kind regards, heinz

JB2

  • Guest
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2011, 07:55:31 PM »
Very nice.  Perhaps the maker will provide some details?  (hinthint)

And a big 'thank you' to Jan Riser for making these incredibly detailed pix available.  I've heard that sort of thing is easier now with the digital format, but you can't prove it with any of my efforts!

JimB

Offline Ken G

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5526
  • F & AM #758
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2011, 02:10:08 AM »
Another beautiful rifle by Roger!  I love it. Clean and lean. Proof positive a rifle doesn't have to be carved and engraved to have real eye appeal. I'd like to know some of the specs too?  What lock is that?  What technique did you use for the metal finish.  It looks great.

Cheers,
Ken
« Last Edit: August 12, 2011, 02:12:50 AM by Ken G »
Failure only comes when you stop trying.

Offline rsells

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2011, 03:31:39 AM »
The profile of the rifle came from an original William Douglas that I own.  I used an old Douglas 13/16 x 44 inch .40 cal. barrel I had been saving for many years for myself.  I cut the muzzle back to 43 inches in total barrel length.  The original rifle had a 44 inch x 7/8 .40 cal. barrel.  The lock is a Chambers late Ketland with the tail rounded and the width narrowed to match the original lock used on the Douglas rifle.  However, the original rifle has a cap lock on it.  I used Davis #4 set triggers with the front trigger modified a bit.  The butt plate, triggerguard, toe plate, side plate, nose cap, and rear sight were copied from the original rifle.  The grease hole was added later at the request of the customer.  The original rifle just had a curly maple butt stock.  This is the third rifle I have made like this, and for some reason it has a much better hold than the others.  Wish I had kept the rifle for myself. 

I drawfiled and finished the metal parts with 220 grit sandpaper, coated it with
44-40 cold blue, and submerged the parts in 100% Clorox (cold) for 4 to 6 minutes to lightly pit the parts.  I sanded the scale off, applied the cold blue again, and steel wooled the metal back to the gray color I wanted.  Hope this info will be of help.

JB2

  • Guest
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2011, 07:23:04 AM »
Great info, Thanks.  I was curious about that buttplate profile since its not the deep crescent like a lot of mountain rifles I''ve seen pics of.  It actually looks a lot like one I just modified to fit me for my next project, with most of the curve in the top third or so of the plate.  Neat.  Interesting that it is copied from an original Douglas.  Great work!

Offline rsells

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2011, 08:31:24 AM »
Jim,
The length and width of the butt plate final going up the comb is like the original, and the width and taper of the back of the butt plate matches the original.  However, I did change the cresent of the back of the butt so the heal of the rifle would rest on the ground when loading vertical and not the toe.  The Douglas rifle had the toe of the butt plate extending below the plane of the heal making you load the rifle at an angle and not verticle.  I had to make the cresent curve of the back of the butt not as deep to achieve this.
                                                                           Roger

JB2

  • Guest
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2011, 03:20:43 PM »
hah!  That was pretty much my logic too, and with a bit of of tweeking to the crescent it just happened to fit my shoulder really nice .  You said this one held much better than the others you'd made like it, do you know why it felt better than the previous two?  Just wondering what the differences may have been. 

Thanks again
Jim


Offline rsells

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2011, 05:28:23 PM »
The only significant difference between the three is that the one that feels best was a 13/16 x 43 inch .40 cal, and the other two were 3/4 x 44 and 42 inch .29 and .30 cal barrels.  Everything else was basically the same.  I guess the barrel weight is what makes it feel different. 
                                                                            Roger

ironwolf

  • Guest
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2011, 05:20:44 AM »
  Roger, if you don't mind my asking, what's your reasoning for using an aged finish on the metal with a new looking stock?  I do love the rifle though.  Great architecture.

  Kevin

Offline rsells

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #9 on: August 13, 2011, 08:39:40 AM »
The majority of my customers request the aged finish on the metal parts.  I still use a dark brown finish on my Hawken rifles unless someone specifically request the aged finish.  I haven't come to terms with stressing the stock after spending a bunch of time to make the surface smooth without any imperfections.  I had made one rifle for the Tennessee State folks for a display a few years back that I aged the wood as well, but that is the only one to date.  I think it is not in my DNA to age the stock at this point because of my real world job (quality engineer) I had for many years and the type of work envolved.
                                                                                Roger
                                                                     

ironwolf

  • Guest
Re: Roger Sells on blog
« Reply #10 on: August 13, 2011, 02:20:39 PM »
  I thought it might be a customer thing.

 Thanks, K