Author Topic: Large bore Lancaster  (Read 12065 times)

Offline rich pierce

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19696
Re: Large bore Lancaster
« Reply #25 on: October 11, 2011, 08:49:31 PM »
Some of the earliest Lancaster rifles had good architecture for heavy recoil and very wide buttplates.  Look at the early Dickerts numbered among the Christians Spring rifles in Rifles of Colonial America volume 1, and the Albrecht rifle.  The buttplates are 2"+ wide, pretty flat, and the stocks are fairly straight.  I would not use a kit Lancaster for a heavy recoiling rifle without making sure the buttplate etc was just what I wanted.
Andover, Vermont

Offline doulos

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
Re: Large bore Lancaster
« Reply #26 on: October 11, 2011, 10:29:51 PM »
After handling a Schreit style at Dixons I thought  that would be a great rifle for a .58 cal. Nice wide butt plate. So I decided to have one built in that style

Offline Dphariss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9928
  • Kill a Commie for your Mommy
Re: Large bore Lancaster
« Reply #27 on: October 11, 2011, 10:47:24 PM »
After handling a Schreit style at Dixons I thought  that would be a great rifle for a .58 cal. Nice wide butt plate. So I decided to have one built in that style

This rifle will likely work but you must understand that the wide buttplate is only part of the equation.
I once had a wide butt rifle that was a cheek bone biter until I made a higher set of sights for it.
So the whole buttstock needs to be properly designed.

Dan
He who dares not offend cannot be honest. Thomas Paine