Chris, yes, that is the idea. And the actual curve of the steel face is also a factor in ensuring that initial strike angle remains the same all the way down. As the edge travels down the steel it also forces the steel to move back against it. I think that is terribly clever. At least that is how I see it.
And Tom, yes I understand your point and that can be necessary. But if the flint has to be tried upside or downside, further out then expected or with the cock jaws crowding the steel face, does that not suggest the lock geometry isn't as good as it should/could be? That is the distance between the cock and frizzen pivot points, the length of the pan cover, the throw of the cock, the curve of the steel? So yes, it may be necessary but my suggestion is that it should not have to be necessary in a properly designed lock?
Back into the fray ......