Author Topic: Rifle weight  (Read 10203 times)

Offline Dennis Glazener

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19486
    • GillespieRifles
Re: Rifle weight
« Reply #25 on: September 25, 2014, 03:56:22 PM »
Quote
Thanks! So if I start with a southern Mt blank, inletted for this barrel I will be on the right track?
I agree with Ed Wenger, good choice, its an English lock, about as fast as any made and very reliable. If you want a round tailed lock (like many southern rifles) you can easily grind the "teat" off the rear of the late Ketland.
Dennis
"I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend" - Thomas Jefferson

Online Daryl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15851
Re: Rifle weight
« Reply #26 on: September 25, 2014, 04:29:47 PM »
The rifle Taylor pictured is heavy for people with arm-shoulder problems, but it holds beautifully for a flinlock offhand rifle.  It was even better with the 42" parallel sided 7/8" oct. in .40 cal.
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a spaniel without ears" King George V

Offline Virginiarifleman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Re: Rifle weight
« Reply #27 on: September 26, 2014, 07:00:07 PM »
Chambers Late Ketland is the way to go. they are fast.