Author Topic: Are Tool Marks Acceptable?  (Read 6465 times)

Offline Jim Kibler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4471
    • Personal Website
Re: Are Tool Marks Acceptable?
« Reply #50 on: February 16, 2019, 07:18:54 PM »
Here are a few of my thoughts...

First, not all tool marks are desirable.  There are marks made by an experienced hand with quality tools and then there are marks made by those less skillful.  The results are very different.  An example is faceted background of carving versus torn grain or corners of chisels digging in during the wood removal.

Not all scraping is equal.  Some can be very coarse and heavy, while at the same time it can be done very delicately such that very fine finishes can be acheived.  Each can be nice depending on what you are trying to acheive and personal taste.

Tool marks can add a great deal of visual interest in my view.  I've made guns finished to an extremely fine level.  Some of these have turned out well, but I think some have been a little too sterile.

Leaving tool marks is not necessarily a shortcut.  For example, I can create a very smooth background when carving by using abrasives easier than I can create a faceted surface from chisel cuts or scraping. 

Jim

Offline jerrywh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8885
    • Jerrywh-gunmaker- Master  Engraver FEGA.
Re: Are Tool Marks Acceptable?
« Reply #51 on: February 16, 2019, 10:27:56 PM »
 Concerning tool marks. Years ago when I was learning to make flintlocks I studied the tool marks on the lock parts of  original guns in order to determine how they were made. I learned a great deal in doing so.  Back then there were no books or internet on the subject. Thanks for tool marks.
Nobody is always correct, Not even me.

Offline Daryl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15784
Re: Are Tool Marks Acceptable?
« Reply #52 on: February 16, 2019, 10:59:17 PM »
I like the tool marks on this lock.



Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a spaniel without ears" King George V