Phil, thanks for the article! Being a skeptic, I wonder if it’s possible they used an old flint barrel and converted it to percussion to build this gun, or if it was built by them as flint, and the local owner returned it to be “percussed”. Either way the ones that are unique - guard, guard attachment, and lock bolt inlays, as well as brazed on bolster in this case - are really cool and must be quite early.
Rich, anything is possible. Unfortunately, we can only make guesses about this rifle since all we have are the pictures of it from Kollar's article. I think it is wise to be skeptical. I find it interesting that Kollar did not include a picture of the "J&S Hawken, St. Louis" stamp on the barrel.
As you probably know, some other early J&S Hawken rifles such as the Peterson J&S Hawken, the J&S Hawken rifle in the Montana Historical Society collection, and the GW Atchison J&S Hawken do not have the "St. Louis" address included with the name. I'm not sure what significance to make of this, but I would have thought that if they had the "St. Louis" stamp early, they would have used it as they consistently did later on.
I don't recall anybody else writing about examining or even seeing the Kollar J&S Hawken before it was lost in the fire, therefore we don't have any other observations to go by.
BigSkyRamble, I do agree that the Phil Sanders copy of the Kollar rifle is a special rifle. Now that I know it exists, it is obviously connected to the Fred Johnson copy as Fred had probably befriended Phil Sanders at the time that Sanders was making that particular rifle.
If you are interested, here is a scan from
The Book of Buckskinning III of the Fred Johnson piece.