Today Steve Chapman and I timed three Siler locks. Each was a modified one with unique features. We did 20 trials each. We were aware before we began that the multiple differences in these locks would make it difficult to draw conclusions about what made each lock fast. By the time we were done, it didn't make any difference. The locks were so close in performance that the differences were not an issue. In fact, it shows that a good lock can be set up different ways by different tuners and still provide great performance.
An example of the differences is the strength of the frizzen spring. There is a large difference in spring strengths but the performance was almost identical. My complements to Sam Everly on his tuning job. His ball bearing lock (#4) was silky smooth and easy to work with.
My complements to Jim Chambers also. His rebuild of my test-bed Siler (#2) was slightly faster than the other two. It's the one with the bronze bushing. The other lock (#3) was one Jim and I collaborated in 1992. We tested the lock 6 different ways, and this lock has the best of those 6 tries. The MB article was with this lock.
Below is a sheet that outlines the modifications and notes the spring strengths. Note that on locks #2, #3 the pull weight was less going to full cock than going to half cock. That could be felt during the trials. When I add this to my web site I'll include a list of all the trials, but for now here is a summary:
My thanks to Steve for helping out today. This is more fun with another flint fan to work with. If I forgot something, I'm sure he'll step in.
Regards,
Pletch