I would have to see where the exact rifle was actually protected by trademark to think it was ILLEGAL to copy it.
Actually everything that you write or make carries a legal copyright. The problem is defending it. All that registering a copyright does is help you defend it in case you ever need to.
http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf
http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-duration.html#duration
Dennis
I have been involved with publishing/writing off and on for over 30 years. I know that what I write is copyrighted as I write it. I also know that copyrights EXPIRE.
For example, my copy of Greener's "The Gun and its Developement" is too old to copyright. Just because the text might appear in later versions does not mean I am not free to use what is in my edition.
Trademarks are NOT the same as copyrights and can be bought and sold and remain valid indefinitely. The old Sharps Rifle Co. "Old Reliable" marking is now owned by C. Sharps Arms/Montana Armory who bought it some years back from its owner at the time and then denied Shiloh Sharps using it any longer. But nobody has tried to stop anyone from making the Sharps, Winchester 66,73,76,86,92 models. Or Ballards or 1911 Colts, or Colt SAA or a host of various percussion revolvers all of which are made in significant numbers by numerous firms. The SAA and 1911 Colta are an iconic symbol of Colt Firearms. One or the other is surely the most widely used and COPIED commercial firearm on the planet. Many are IDENTICAL the "Gov't Model"/SAA But the PATENTS are LONG expired.
The rifle is too old, its creator and his offspring and THEIR grandchildren are dead. I don't see how anyone can copyright someone else's 200 year old work.
Bought my 1896 edition of Greener, I own it, I can read it or use it to prop up a short leg on a chair or set fire to it, but I have no right to copyright it.
Where did Small get the engraving and carving patterns?
Are these not public domain if HE copied them from patterns his master had? Or from some other pattern book? Do any of the details of THIS rifle appear on other Small rifles? How about the buttplate and TG? Did he buy them or make them? If he BOUGHT them who's work are they? Does this mean that these parts that are common perhaps the a number of rifles cannot be duplicated?
Its silly.
I don't think it would stand any sort of challenge.
Like I said I will ask a lawyer tomorrow if I think of it.
Dan