What techniques should be used with straight barrels to make a nice stock that is not overly skinny though the breech when using 13/16th or thinner barrels
when making a squirrel rifle ?
Backround :I have been working on a late period flint long rifle that is using a straight 13/16th barrel ,40’’ long ,.40 caliber using a late Chambers Ketland.
The weight is almost as good as a swamped barrel but not being swamped the skinny area through the breech takes a bit more thought and there is little room for error .
While I am well on my way through this project, I started thinking about how I would do this differently next time besides just using a swamped barrel .
Here is what I have been thinking about ....
1)Fudge the ramrod hole through the forestock favoring the lock panel molding opposite the lock side so the mainspring will not intrude into the ramrod hole .
2) Use a tapered ramrod
3)Soft solder a bolster, possibly tapered , on the lock side to bump the lock out making the breech area a bit thicker.
The skinny straight 13/16th barrels did not exist in the late period from what I’ve read so perhaps this is a problem only for contemporary builders .
Straight barrels while correct on small caliber late rifles were quite thick .Originals I have handled while nicely proportioned
handled more like car axles for off- hand shooting. Using a thick barrel just doesn’t make for a good carrying woods rifle.
The thin breech area is what concerns me most .
I did not want to file the bolster on the lock itself .I had tried that once before some years ago but did not get sufficient flair,
and that drove the mainspring into the ramrod channel .
Elsewhere ,some members suggested adding material to the lock bolster and frizzen but those are metal working skills and equipment not readily available.
Another member suggested the bolster idea which seemed a good solution .
Has anyone done that ? Any other thoughts or ideas ?
Stuart Cee Dub