Author Topic: Historically Correct Flintlocks  (Read 32580 times)

Offline bgf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1403
Re: Historically Correct Flintlocks
« Reply #75 on: December 09, 2015, 03:40:09 AM »
Also, #90, now percussion, but made with vent pick holder...

Offline jerrywh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8885
    • Jerrywh-gunmaker- Master  Engraver FEGA.
Re: Historically Correct Flintlocks
« Reply #76 on: December 09, 2015, 05:11:49 AM »
 I am positive I have several photos of half stock flintlock So called Kentucky rifles. I always considered a Kentucky rifle or a American long rifle as a full stock but it is not so  amongst the collectors nor is it so in the antique auction catalogs. There were also long rifles made in England for export into the States.
Nobody is always correct, Not even me.

Offline oldtravler61

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4447
  • We all make mistakes.
Re: Historically Correct Flintlocks
« Reply #77 on: December 10, 2015, 04:25:57 AM »
Just wondering. As like now, If the customer wanted a half stock flintlock.
 You don't thank he would have made it for his buyer. Or would he tell them to go somewhere else. Just wondering. Just because there are few surviving pieces doesn't mean that they were uncommon. Me thanks ww 1 an w w 2 metal drives might have gathered up a few. Yeah think?

Offline okieboy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 822
Re: Historically Correct Flintlocks
« Reply #78 on: December 10, 2015, 08:35:37 AM »
"Just because there are few surviving pieces doesn't mean that they were uncommon. Me thanks ww 1 an w w 2 metal drives might have gathered up a few. Yeah think?"

 Yes, but why did they so thoroughly melt almost every half stock flint and refuse so many of the half stock percussions that we have remaining?
Okieboy

Offline Mike Brooks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13415
    • Mike Brooks Gunmaker
Re: Historically Correct Flintlocks
« Reply #79 on: December 10, 2015, 02:44:12 PM »
"Just because there are few surviving pieces doesn't mean that they were uncommon. Me thanks ww 1 an w w 2 metal drives might have gathered up a few. Yeah think?"

 Yes, but why did they so thoroughly melt almost every half stock flint and refuse so many of the half stock percussions that we have remaining?
Obviously flint haters....
NEW WEBSITE! www.mikebrooksflintlocks.com
Say, any of you boys smithies? Or, if not smithies per se, were you otherwise trained in the metallurgic arts before straitened circumstances forced you into a life of aimless wanderin'?

rhbrink

  • Guest
Re: Historically Correct Flintlocks
« Reply #80 on: December 10, 2015, 03:18:08 PM »

So it begs the question how many half stock percussion rifles were originally flint that were changed over some time in their lives. I would bet more than a few.  I do think that there is nothing prettier than a long barreled full stock flinter but if I'm target shooting and hunting the X on every shot I will take a half stock every time over a full stock. PERIOD!!!!!

RB

Offline oldtravler61

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4447
  • We all make mistakes.
Re: Historically Correct Flintlocks
« Reply #81 on: December 11, 2015, 05:53:18 AM »
Me thinks there might be a few here that might big to differ on that. But as in something else we all have opinions.

Offline Clark Badgett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2265
  • Oklahoma
Re: Historically Correct Flintlocks
« Reply #82 on: December 11, 2015, 07:41:26 AM »
"Just because there are few surviving pieces doesn't mean that they were uncommon. Me thanks ww 1 an w w 2 metal drives might have gathered up a few. Yeah think?"

 Yes, but why did they so thoroughly melt almost every half stock flint and refuse so many of the half stock percussions that we have remaining?

Because there were most likely a lot more half stock percussion guns made than longrifles. There was this whole westward expansion and immigration thing going on with small shops and factories cranking them out. Just about every major city had a gunmaker or two.
Psalms 144