Author Topic: Fordney lock?  (Read 5749 times)

Offline scotchindian

  • Starting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Fordney lock?
« on: March 30, 2016, 03:42:05 AM »
Check ebay item id182070634551(I don't know how to link the auction). Seller states this is an original 18th century lock, with M.fordney engraved on it. Is this a legitimate original Melchoir Fordney lock?

Offline PPatch

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2016, 05:05:15 AM »
"The only flaw is that someone apparently has glorified it with the name "M. FORDNEY."  Since it was the practice of early Pennsylvania makers to mark the barrel and not the lock, it is unlikely that this marking is original."

The seller seems to believe the name is an addition. Personally I have no clue. It is a very nice lock however.

dave
Dave Parks   /   Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


oakridge

  • Guest
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2016, 08:48:32 PM »
IMO, it's obvious. The Fordney name on the lock is a fairly recent addition.

Offline bama

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2174
    • Calvary Longrifles
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2016, 02:44:05 AM »
To bad, you can still see a little of the original stamping or engraving under the new engraving.
Jim Parker

"An Honest Man is worth his weight in Gold"

Online rich pierce

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19534
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2016, 03:44:25 AM »
Really nice lock, probably de-valued by the addition of the signature.
Andover, Vermont

Offline Buck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
  • A.F.A.M. # 934, Trinity Commandry #80
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2016, 04:03:56 AM »
PPATCH,
Dickert signed some of his locks and he was an early maker, where Fordney was not an early maker and signed some of his locks also.
Buck

Offline D. Taylor Sapergia

  • Member 3
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2016, 07:20:35 PM »
But this one has been signed over an old signature.  Fake.
D. Taylor Sapergia
www.sapergia.blogspot.com

Art is not an object.  It is the excitement inspired by the object.

Offline Eric Kettenburg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4178
    • Eric Kettenburg
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2016, 07:50:33 PM »
Too bad, looks like a nice little French lock probably 1770s-1780s or so, off a double gun (hence the step in the bolster).  The signature is obviously an add-on and it definitely looks a little crude too.  Someone REALLY good with a fine little stick welder, some very careful clean up and subsequent age 'matching' could probably make it go away, would be worth the work if the matching left side lock were also present.
Strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government!

Offline Buck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
  • A.F.A.M. # 934, Trinity Commandry #80
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2016, 01:33:20 AM »
D. Taylor Sapergia,
I wasn't implying it was authentic, only that "early practice of PA builders was to sign their barrels, not their locks" is incorrect. It's an obvious forgery, I didn't deem it necessary to comment on that.
Buck

Offline Shreckmeister

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3808
  • GGGG Grandpa Schrecengost Gunsmith/Miller
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2016, 09:53:25 PM »
Winning bid:

US $448.00


 [ 16 bids
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.

Offline bp

  • Starting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Fordney lock?
« Reply #11 on: April 07, 2016, 06:38:09 PM »
Might the cock be a replacement?
It does not appear to have engraving to match the plate.
Maybe they were made that way?