Author Topic: Fowler mystery  (Read 6939 times)

eddillon

  • Guest
Fowler mystery
« on: February 25, 2016, 03:28:33 AM »
I may have posted this a few years back.  In any case I have failed to identify the maker.  The barrel is Oct to Rnd w/  wedding band.  Damascus twist 10 bore and is 48.5 inches long.  Fowler is 65 inches overall.  Barrel is 1.685 inches across at the breech, 1.320 at the band, 1.262 infront of the band and 987 at the muzzle.  The massive lock has been converted to percussion.  Very clever brazed seams on the english style drum.  Stock is walnut.  Inlays look to be American  Intfesting flat bottom trigger guard.  Lock is marked Mc.......  No way to decipher the letters after the Mc.  Barrel is Birmingham proofed and marked "twisted" on the bottom flat.  Faint remains of engraved "LONDON on the top flat.  Any help would be appreciated.

 

 

 







« Last Edit: February 25, 2016, 03:30:58 AM by aka california eddillon »

Offline nord

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2016, 03:43:31 AM »
My opinion for what it's worth...

Given the patent breach and the lock configuration... Always percussion.

I'd lay odds on European walnut.

General style says British and I'd guess built for the trade.

Proofs hidden under the barrel will tell us more.
In Memory of Lt. Catherine Hauptman Miller 6/1/21 - 10/1/00 & Capt. Raymond A. Miller 12/26/13 - 5/15/03...  They served proudly.

eddillon

  • Guest
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2016, 03:57:07 AM »
Birmingham.  Lock is definitely a conversion.  Unable to get good photos of the brazed on drum.  But it appearsto be a well done add on.

Offline D. Taylor Sapergia

  • Member 3
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2016, 04:14:48 AM »
What makes you think it's a conversion?  From the photo, I'd agree with NORD...original percussion lock.
D. Taylor Sapergia
www.sapergia.blogspot.com

Art is not an object.  It is the excitement inspired by the object.

Offline JCKelly

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1434
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2016, 04:33:19 AM »
Maybe the cutout in the wood just behind breech, so a flint cock could rest on the plate?

eddillon

  • Guest
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2016, 08:07:33 AM »
I'll post a photo of the back side of the lock plate.  It will become obvious.  The conversion is one of the finest I have encountered.

eddillon

  • Guest
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2016, 11:00:25 PM »
Here are some photos to show the conversion of the breech plug, tang and lock.  I rest my case.  Very elaborate conversion.

Nipple drum brazed on-two pieces added
 

Bottom view-note brazing.


Hook breech tang face.  Piece added on.


Inside of lock-plugged frizzen hole.


Plugged frizzen spring screw hole left of mainspring pin hole.


Bottom flat markings and proofs



Offline rich pierce

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19550
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2016, 12:20:46 AM »
Some very fine work there.
Andover, Vermont

Offline nord

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2016, 12:49:59 AM »
Once again an opinion...

A single screw lock would be somewhat unusual for a flint gun. The stock shows no evidence of a second cross screw.

I agree about the workmanship. Given what I see I'd at least consider that the gun was out-shopped as a percussion piece.

Proofs are as I suspected.

The gun hails from a time when flint was fading but not yet fully retired. Indications that the stock may have been made with provisions for flint ignition might suggest that the final product could have been either. In this case I suspect always percussion.
In Memory of Lt. Catherine Hauptman Miller 6/1/21 - 10/1/00 & Capt. Raymond A. Miller 12/26/13 - 5/15/03...  They served proudly.

Offline Mike Brooks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13415
    • Mike Brooks Gunmaker
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2016, 01:03:44 AM »
Nothing unusual about a late period single screw English flint lock.
NEW WEBSITE! www.mikebrooksflintlocks.com
Say, any of you boys smithies? Or, if not smithies per se, were you otherwise trained in the metallurgic arts before straitened circumstances forced you into a life of aimless wanderin'?

Offline Don Stith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2815
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2016, 01:19:00 AM »
Not unusual for an English conversion to replace the entire breech and tang. They were really good. This one might have had the tang section replaced.  Pretty piece

eddillon

  • Guest
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2016, 02:06:37 AM »
Nothing unusual about a late period single screw English flint lock.
There is a hook at the front of the lock.

eddillon

  • Guest
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #12 on: February 26, 2016, 02:10:08 AM »
Not unusual for an English conversion to replace the entire breech and tang. They were really good. This one might have had the tang section replaced.  Pretty piece
Don,
There is definitely a piece of metal brazed to the front of the tang.  The piece was cut/filed to conform to the octagonal shape of the tang.

Offline Feltwad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 892
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2016, 03:18:34 PM »
What you have is a flintlock conversion  with a new breech plug and tang  fitted, this principle  followed the early drum and nipple Have several with this type of breech plug which was mostley used  on the large bores such has 10,8,6,.
Feltwad

6bore Fowler

Large bore Fowler


2nd and Third From the right with this type
« Last Edit: February 26, 2016, 03:41:13 PM by Feltwad »

Offline Mike Brooks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13415
    • Mike Brooks Gunmaker
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #14 on: February 26, 2016, 03:47:51 PM »
Nothing unusual about a late period single screw English flint lock.
There is a hook at the front of the lock.
Also not unusual for a single bolt lock.
NEW WEBSITE! www.mikebrooksflintlocks.com
Say, any of you boys smithies? Or, if not smithies per se, were you otherwise trained in the metallurgic arts before straitened circumstances forced you into a life of aimless wanderin'?

Offline Don Stith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2815
Re: Fowler mystery
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2016, 07:29:25 PM »
 Gardners "Small Arms Makers" lists 18  Non-USA makers that start with Mc. Only a handful are the right time period to have possibly made your fowler
McDermott   Dublin Ireland 1792-1820
 McKenzie  London, scotland
 McKnight Ireland
McNab  Scotland
 McWilliams  London
 Maybe having those names will help you make out more of the stamp.
 Fairly sure your breech and tang were replaced  during the conversion.  That was the technique used in Europe