Author Topic: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?  (Read 1574 times)

Offline Skychief

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 652
Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« on: September 10, 2018, 02:43:16 AM »
Will soon buy a casting pot for ladle use, NOT bottom pour.  Any opinions on Lyman or Lee?

Thanks, Skychief.

Offline Darkhorse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1665
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2018, 03:57:09 AM »
I would get the one that's deeper for ladle pour.
If you had of been asking about bottom pour I would have recommended a LEE as I used one for years. But since you didn't ask I won't recommend one.
American horses of Arabian descent.

Offline rollingb

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2018, 04:01:49 AM »
I've got 2 Lee 20 lb. melting pots and they both work well for me, one started out as a bottom pour, but I removed the rod and dropped a small steel ball in the hole as I prefer casting with a ladle.

The other pot is ladle pour only.
I use one pot for casting pure lead balls, and the other one for casting hardened balls and conicals. 

I cast a fair amount and my newest pot is 2-3 years old and the other one is 15-16 years old.  :)
http://tradmla.org/tmaf/index.php
"An honest man is worth his weight in gold"

Offline stubshaft

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2018, 04:18:13 AM »
I also have 2 twenty pound Lee pots with solid bottoms for ladle casting.  The first was a drip-o-matic until I bought a new replacement liner from Lee.  One is dedicated to pure lead and the other holds alloy for hard balls and unmentionables.  I have been casting since the late 60's and have used/owned RCBS, SAECO and Lyman pots.  The others broke or were too heavy or just irritated me so I sold them.  I also have a 10 lb pot to preheat lead when I cast 500+ grain balls/slugs.
I'd rather die standing, than live on my knees...

Offline P.W.Berkuta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2018, 07:18:04 PM »
Will soon buy a casting pot for ladle use, NOT bottom pour.  Any opinions on Lyman or Lee?

Thanks, Skychief.
I prefer a dip pot and I also prefer a pot that does not drain the bank when I buy it. Lee pots are a great bang for the buck and you can get parts for less if a element burns out which I never had happen yet.
"The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person who is doing it." - Chinese proverb

Offline Daryl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15826
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2018, 09:50:37 PM »
I'm on 2nd and 3rd Lee 20 pound pots - dipping as that is the way for me to get perfect bullets every cast+ or almost every cast

With round balls, no matter the size, virtually all are as close to perfect.
I start right off with lead and released mould at optimum temperature. I really don't like casting any more, so prefer  to not have to waste time reeling and reading rejects
 I pefer to cast as close to perfect as possible.
Dipping has done this for.me. One of my pots was converted from bottom pour to dipping. The other was purchased  as a dipping pot. That one odd my pure lead pot. The other has my BPS bullet mix.
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a spaniel without ears" King George V

Offline hanshi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5335
  • My passion is longrifles!
    • martialartsusa.com
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2018, 12:18:46 AM »
I've two Lee bottom pour pots but one stopped working and I couldn't bring it with me when we moved.  The other Lee pot was sent back to Lee a few decades back and came back to me looking brand new.  That one still works even though a bit gnarly.  Long ago I had a BP Lyman pot and it just never worked as well as the Lee.  I get excellent ball using the Lee; and that's with Lee molds, Lyman, Seaco, RCBS, T/C and others.

I've cast untold numbers of ball using a dipper AND the Lee pots.  I often get good ball from the first cast regardless whether dip or BP.  As long as I keep everything hot there's no problem.
!Jozai Senjo! "always present on the battlefield"
Young guys should hang out with old guys; old guys know stuff.

J.E. Moore

  • Guest
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2018, 01:16:55 AM »
I've used a Lee for several years also and have made untold pounds of balls with it. I've learned to keep a paint can lid and some paperclips handy for when the valve gets trashed up. It's always melted lead though.

rfd

  • Guest
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2018, 01:45:25 AM »
hands down, the lee 20# ladle pot.  i still have 3 that are over a decade, all work just fine, and 2 of 'em get used weekly for plain lead or 16:1 alloy.  a good ladle, a bit of sawdust for flux, a thermometer, and yer good to go.

Offline Dphariss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9920
  • Kill a Commie for your Mommy
Re: Lee vs Lyman casting pots?
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2018, 02:09:18 AM »
I bought a Lyman Mag Dipper when they first came out, quite some time back 25+ I suspect. 20# capacity, still works perfect, holds a close temperature spread. I would not by anything else it it died. I used to cast a lot of lead bullets so it's been used.....

Dan
He who dares not offend cannot be honest. Thomas Paine