Caution: Sure to ruffle feathers but here it is anyway.
Re: Gunmakers match.
Some criticism, hopefully constructive. From a shooters standpoint.
Historically matches were shot for prizes. Sometimes pretty good sums of money, turkeys, beef, hams etc. They got the prize based on the score they shot, target they hit etc.
Now much of our shooting is done by lottery.
Yes I know the reasoning for lotterys, at least what I have been told every time I bring this up...
Shooting matches should reward skill. Rewarding mediocrity is a modern idea.
The gunmakers match sounds like it was designed by the "self-esteem" committee at a liberal arts college. Don't want anyone doing too well intentionally... Someones self-esteem might be "crushed". A drawing gives everyone a way to save face.
Thus the person who goes to the time and trouble to develop his skills is effectively punished for striving for excellence, the time and effort he spends thrown away. This is grossly unfair. How can anyone practice for a lottery? What is the point?
A person could shoot a toilet paper "ball" and win the powder horn.
One shot matches have a long history, the "King" match in Schuetzen for example. But they have a visible aiming point, may be small and/or off center, but its there to be aimed at. Luck or otherwise at least the shooters get to see the target.
I am sure someone will have their feathers ruffled but read what I have written carefully its a statement of fact as I see it. I have attended many matches that featured lotterys. If they have enough donations almost everyone gets something.
But the best shooters, if they miss in the "draw" get some trophy or gee-gaw that is simply a dust collector.
Sorry for the rant.
Dan