Author Topic: actual 1826 plains flint halfstock  (Read 2779 times)

Offline Dan'l 1946

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
Re: actual 1826 plains flint halfstock
« Reply #25 on: November 07, 2022, 02:10:25 AM »
   Maybe the Hawken Brothers decided to go with the crescent butt piece because the end users tended to carry them on horseback and firing across the chest kept the muzzle blast away from the horse's head. Another advantage is when firing from cover, you are less exposed with the rifle mounted above the bicep instead of on the shoulder. I have both crescent and flat butted rifles and do not find one more comfortable than the other. But the crescent plate is maybe a bit more stylish. Dan

Offline JHeath

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
Re: actual 1826 plains flint halfstock
« Reply #26 on: November 08, 2022, 11:38:19 PM »
None of the above explains schuetzen buttplates or modern target buttplate hooks. Ask anybody why those exist and the answer is not "style" or "loading". There is a legit technical reason, obvious and agreed upon by everyone. Extensions on the butt hold the butt down and the muzzle up. And this is especially true when the left hand hold is significantly aft of the rifle's balance point. The heel and toe of crescent plates are extended just like schuetzen plates for exactly the same reason.  They support the muzzle of long or heavy barrels.

In Asia you see plaques next to toilets, diagramming for the locals that you sit on the toilet. There's a red slash showing that you do NOT climb atop the toilet and squat. Laugh all you want, but climbing on a toilet and squatting makes a h*ll of a lot more sense than mounting a long sharp crescent plate to the shoulder pocket.