Author Topic: Muzzle "coning" question  (Read 3059 times)

Offline Mattox Forge

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 404
Re: Muzzle "coning" question
« Reply #25 on: December 31, 2022, 06:38:36 AM »
Photo of an 1803 Harpers Ferry rifle muzzle made in 1818. The grooves seem to have been filed out at the muzzle.




Mike
« Last Edit: December 31, 2022, 09:09:23 PM by Mattox Forge »

Offline Daryl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15822
Re: Muzzle "coning" question
« Reply #26 on: December 31, 2022, 10:24:44 PM »
Without some sort of 'relieving' of the lands AND grooves, a snug enough load to produce any sort of accuracy would be impossible.
That is was done is well known.
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a spaniel without ears" King George V

Offline Rich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
Re: Muzzle "coning" question
« Reply #27 on: January 15, 2023, 11:45:41 AM »
Maybe in the old days, the bore of the barrel was coned prior to being rifled. It might allow the grooves to remain a constant depth to the lands. It would also make it easier to start the rifling cutter at the bore. Just a thought with no evidence.

Offline Daryl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15822
Re: Muzzle "coning" question
« Reply #28 on: January 15, 2023, 10:17:40 PM »
Don't know one way or the other.  The huge book on Jaegers that Taylor bought through this forum some years ago, has wonderful pictures of the muzzles of MANY Jaeger rifles.
Virtually ALL of them are filed out in both lands and grooves to aid in loading. They are not coned, unless you want to call all muzzle treatment of enlargement, coning.
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a spaniel without ears" King George V