Actually I find a Sharps or my RB as historically interesting as any cap lock. And getting my 45-70 to shoot well was much more challenging than any round ball rifle. But, that is my opinion and it is based on experiences with both caplocks and BPC. Like my 16 bore breech loader with hammers. Its the use of the hammers and the cloud of smoke taht makes it interesting, the loading afterward is not really that which does anything for me. I have expressd my opinions based on experiences, but I was referred to as one of the "flintlock snobs". To me the term "snob" is equated with some over dressed woman that brags about buying her clothes at Dalton's when she could get the same thing at Target for less. My preferences for flintlocks is also based on shooting experiences. Am I a snob? I do not feel so as to percussions. Now I am considering compound bows and modern ML zip guns, but not historical arms. I have had a lot of good times shooting with people that prefer percussion. I also have pet percussion rifle I made out of spare parts left over from other builds that has taken deer and won a few matches when I shot it. Its on its second barrel. I can appreciate pet rifles and have regretted selling one. When I recommend a flintlock its based on experiences and my opion of fun, not snobbery or looking down my nose at those that use percussions. There is an appeal to any of the ML's that can be fun. I still get more frustrated with a BPC as after years of shooting I can expect any ML to shoot well with a tight ball patch combo and a range of powder charges. Maybe not its best but pretty good. A BPC can give you fits with alloys, lube, primers and loading technique. Again an opinion.
DP