Ron, thanks for the thoughtful reply.
I have tried vinegar stain, which I have sometimes liked the results very much, and other times I am pulling my hair out trying to get a color I can even start to like. I do, however, like to experiment with old time methods, and am loathe to use a modern stain. But I will use modern steel on the barrel, and lost wax cast parts for my locks, so, I am not consistent in my preferences for old timey methods.
Its hard to tell a steel barrel from a iron one or how a TG was cast after they are finished.
Many modern stains and finishes look like modern stains and finishes.
I can't see people jumping through all sorts of hoops to make a stain when the original makers would in all likelyhood would have not gone to the trouble either.
I KNOW that walnut hull and butternut hull extract with a dark oil will match some late 19th century factory guns for repair work. But these stains really do not like to penetrate the wood at all. But if the color they will produce is needed they are simply wonderful. I would not dream of trying them on maple. I don't really like the color.
Mad Monk sent me some of each some time back (way farther back than I like to think of) and it REALLY saved a friends behind once while working at Shiloh when an original buttstock got damaged. The original wood was very pale under the original stain (I assume) and I knew none of the modern stains would match it, so I tried both the hull extracts and when oiled the match was perfect. I normally don't stain walnut at all.
I like nitrate of iron on maple. So I use it. I don't worry about the color being exactly the shade I want either. I take what comes.
Lucky's reponse:
I have been guilty of questioning people making oddball stains, making remarks about plastic finishes etc. Everyone needs to remember that there are many different points of view on many things and some of us have spent a lot of time looking for things that worked and have ended up with some crummy looking stain jobs that we have no wish to see repeated by anyone.
So when someone tells someone else that they may be barking up the wrong tree its not that we are simply trying to make the experimenter feel bad or impose their will. It may as stated by Lucky that we simply are trying to save someone from a potential self-inflicted wound. Wood is not cheap and getting a stock to the point of staining can involve a lot of labor so being warned or potential problems is a good thing.
I make mistakes all the time that I am sure someone trained by a master under an apprentice program would not. I would have been shown how to do things in training and avoid head banging and hair pulling. That is one of the best things about this site and makers guild organizations etc. is having others to bounce ideas off of or learn by listening/reading.
Much of this is OPINION/shop practice based on experiences. These things tend to vary from gunmaker to gunmaker. If we were ALL taught by the same master things would STILL vary.
So there will be numerous answers to any question put here. Some folks may be compelled to tell someone that they think the project etc is a waste of time. It may very well be. But a warning or urging caution is not the same as holding a gun to someones head to force them into submission.
Dan