All this makes me wonder why we dare build guns at all . I t sounds like just a matter of time before we are all dead or mained!!!
Joking aside, this thread scares me a bit. I buy my liners with the tools to install them from Chambers, use a drillpress and follow the instructions to the letter. Is there any reason I should not trust the results?
I'm planing a left handed percussion Fleeger style rifle. I plan to use a 44" or 46" Price, swamped barrel, caliber 0.50 , B weight, with a lefthand Chamber s mountain style lock with this drum from TOW , "DRUM-8-6-F-L Powder drum, 1/2" diameter, 3/8-24 thread, not drilled for nipple, with lug for installation". I had planed to intall the drum and nipple with TOW recommended tools and instructions. Is this an unsafe build?
The only option to a drum for for southpaw is Tow Kit Carsons, slanted hawken breech
http://www.trackofthewolf.com/Categories/partDetail.aspx?catId=14&subId=143&styleId=516&partNum=PLUG-LH-16-3
Would it be safer to use this, instead of a drum? The tang would have to be modified for a fleeger rifle.
Best regards
Rolf
I have 2 rifles I REALLY like that I just don't shoot any more. Every time I start thinking about shooting them another of these discussions comes up and I chicken out again, one I had shot for over 20 years. I plan to rebarrel at least one of them, maybe both.
I quit building drum and nipple guns long ago. Most of the better guns back in the day used patent breeches anyway. The drum and nipple was a cheap, low tech, back woods way of making a percussion gun (I don't care if they made them in Philadelphia its still a true statement). It has virtually no advantage and a number of disadvantages some of them serious.
I do not particularly like drilling away an entire barrel flat right at the breech for example.
I built a Vincent Ohio rifle with a 1" barrel and it has a "Hawken" patent breech that can have the "hook" locked with a screw. Unless making museum quality repro of an existing gun for appearances only then the patent breech is a better idea. I just wish there was a wider selection.
The thing is that one does not HAVE to use a drum and nipple. There are better options. A good patent breech is stronger and safer especially if it has a fence that shields the nipple and deflects any cap fragments and such away from the shooter.
I make liners from the same stuff that the cracked store bought one was made of but with thicker walls. Even with the crack there was no outward signs of the vent liner moving.
I would just love to make platinum lined steel vent liners but Platinum or even Gold is just too expensive. I have enough platinum to line a nipple may attempt it this week. Have a picket rifle match coming up and need a nipple for the rifle.
I just put a plug in a barrel in place of the old vent liner today. Its 303 stainless. The owner, a friend, wants to do his own hole so I just made a plug and fitted it. Since its already done (the hole in the barrel) I can't make it as I would like to but its not going to gas cut and I have faith that its not coming out till its pulled. The stresses on the vent liner and breech plug are different than the barrel and material that would not be suitable in a barrel is not a deal killer as a vent liner or a breech plug. The plug has no internal pressure in most designs and the vent liner unless very large has little internal pressure and is backed up by the barrel as are most "hollow" plugs. Threaded joints are not the same as tubes.
This is very very complex and while fairly well informed I am not trained in metallurgy. Its not something that is easily explained in a post on a web site.
There are risks in everything.
The failure rate in all MLs even the really junky ones some reenactors use is low. But people need to be informed so they can at least make informed decisions. A low failure rate is meaningless to the injured.
But some have a higher failure rate than others. Back in the 1970s-80s there was a rash of blowups of modern made in US factory MLs. Quite a few that we KNEW of and who knows how many others. This and some things that happened to me in my youth make me cautious.
The "modern" firearms are not immune.
I don't shoot stainless steel barrels anymore and have traded the ones I had off because I learned they have a higher failure rate than steel guns. They tend to fail with FACTORY AMMO as opposed to handloads and plugged barrels which are the prime cause in "steel" guns (so long as they are steel such as 4140/4150. There have been of SS handgun failures (1911s included in which overloads blow the brass cartridge case and operates at RB rifle pressure levels) and some CF rifle failures both here and in Europe. But people just love them stainless steel guns so there is a market for them and the companies keep cranking them out using material that from my reading, is not approved for "pressure vessel" applications by the ASME.
But the makers consider the risks acceptable I guess. But the right lawyer could really make some money off the bigger companies if there is a personal injury accident.
Dan