Taylor: Thanks! I am very happy with it. You are right, the front sight is backwards. I must have had sight dyslexia or something when I installed it! Oh well, turning it around in it's dovetail wont be a big deal.
You are also right that historically these Baker barrels would be browned. I am thinking I am going to leave mine bright, since I like the look of the shiny version. I know not historically accurate, but maybe I will change my mind sometime. Also, like you, I sealed the pores of the wood on the stock with a modern finish, so I departed a little with historical accuracy there too.
The bayonet was kind of a trick to get it to fit, but it fits well. The lug itself had to have both its height and width filed a bit to get it to insert into the sword handle sufficiently and reach the catch on the inside of the handle. I also had to file the side of the noseplate down a bit, and a little wood off of the side of the stock to get the bayonet to slide on once the barrel was installed. I also noticed that to install the barrel, and get the front barrel lugs for the barrel keys down far enough to line up with their respective holes, I had to remove some wood in the barrel groove of the stock around the area where the lug is for the front sling swivel. Not sure if everyone that builds this kit has to do this or if the stock was just not carved like others.
Bob: Sounds like you are busy with your locks! I think that I would have no problem paying $300 for an assembled lock, if I knew it was quality and the springs and frizzen were tempered right. Better than getting a piece of junk that wont spark, and wont help fire your gun properly. It seems this is about the price that TRS wants for assembled locks. You can get a set of lock castings there too, and maybe if you talked to them you could get a partial set as well.
Thanks for your support and encouragement through this. I can see myself making another historic firearm of some type.
Clayton