« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Rice Barrels  (Read 7719 times)

54Bucks

  • Guest
Rice Barrels
« on: September 29, 2011, 04:28:48 PM »
 According to their site they are going strong and will expand their operations in the fall. A good indication gun build is going strong. I was real pleased with my last barrel from them(app. 2 mos. ago) as the outside finish was approaching the inside finish!
Logged

VirginiaSmokepole

  • Guest
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2011, 07:34:08 PM »
My 44" swamped "b" profile Rice will need a little filing, but over all I am very impressed.  I will definitely buy more from Rice.  I also want to try a Getz on my next project.
Logged

mbokie5

  • Guest
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2011, 02:52:41 AM »
What constitutes a match barrel for a muzzle loader?
Logged

Offline wattlebuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2096
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2011, 04:02:51 AM »
I have two .54 rice swamped 38 inch barrels an love them (excellent shooters) an will most certainly use them agian in the future, but for my next build I am going to try a charles burton barrel cause I hear great things on his barrels too :)
Logged
Nothing beats the feel of a handmade southern iron mounted flintlock on a cold frosty morning

Daryl

  • Guest
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2011, 05:55:39 PM »
Quote from: mbokie5 on September 30, 2011, 02:52:41 AM
What constitutes a match barrel for a muzzle loader?

Typically, a Match barrel is one that has square cornered rifling with very narrow lands, .010" to.012" deep and comes from a maker of especially accurate barrels that are hand lapped with lead lapps after rifling.  The lapping trues up the interior and provides a smooth finish free of any chatter or rifling tool marks with all internal machining marks running rear to front or vise versa, but not an ironed burnished finish such as happens when a button is dragged through.  That's my take on it.  I do not know if any muzzleloading barrel makers air-gauge their barrels as modern ctg. barrel makers do - maybe? - doubt it.

Logged

Offline bdixon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
  • F & AM #376.
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2011, 11:30:59 PM »
Has anyone worked with Rice's 46 inch York in B weight?
Logged

Offline Bill of the 45th

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Gaylord, Michigan
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2011, 11:54:53 PM »
I will be when Dave Keck sends it back to me with the stock profile I ordered from him at the CLA Show.

Bill
Logged
Bill Knapp
Over the Hill, What Hill, and when did I go over it?

54Bucks

  • Guest
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2011, 12:30:24 AM »
Quote from: bdixon on October 19, 2011, 11:30:59 PM
Has anyone worked with Rice's 46 inch York in B weight?


 About 6mos. ago I had a Geo. Kreps finished for me using Rice's 46" .50 cal. Bwt.
The guns a real sweatheart that finished out at 7.66 lb. without the RR, weighed on a certified(UPS) scale.
Logged

Offline bdixon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
  • F & AM #376.
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #8 on: October 20, 2011, 04:31:41 PM »
What profiles did you guys put the 46 into?  I know somebody may post that this is not correct, but I am considering putting one in a Bedford.  Although no Bedfords that are known used a swamped profile I wanted a longer barrel Bedford that is a little better balanced than a straight or tapered barrel would provide.  My thoughts were to have the slimmest possible forearm with the Bedford small butt, and maintain a little balance.


Brett.
Logged

Offline Ed Wenger

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2457
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2011, 06:51:54 PM »
Brett,

I've used the 46" barrel in a Krepps, Armstrong, and several Virginia Piedmont rifles.  I love the profile and balance achieved with these barrels, and the ones I shot, performed very nicely.  As to the Bedford consideration, that's up to you.

If you're looking for something slim, I'd take a look at the new "A" weight profile that Rice has.  I don't believe it's available in 46" (42" or 44"?), but it's a wonderful profile that makes for a very nice and slim piece.  Plus, you can get it up to .50 cal.  Best of luck!

              Ed
Logged
Ed Wenger

Daryl

  • Guest
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2011, 07:00:40 PM »
Taylor built an 44" "A" weight with flat bottomed grooves (I think) in .40 Cal. on his Kuntz rifle.  It holds amazingly well- a wonderful shooting & accurate rifle - very easy to hit with. In .50 cal, I'd not be able to shoot it well - to light. I suspect of in .45 cal., it might be to light for good holding as well. It would 'match' up with a Bedford, as the Kuntz has a tiny, slim stock - like a Bedord in weight, I'd expect. The "A" weight makes for a very small, dimensionally, lightweight rifle. Going too large in the calibre would make it to light to be accurate imho.
Logged

Offline bdixon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
  • F & AM #376.
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2011, 07:09:45 PM »
Correct Daryl, I am a little shy of the "A" barrel in too big of a bore, too little wall thickness for me.  B weight for sure in 50 is what I have planned.
Logged

Vomitus

  • Guest
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2011, 08:50:03 PM »
  Brett,
   I have a Bwt. Rice .50x 44" in a JP Beck that is a super little barrel.Wrapped in wood,she weighs in at 7.25 lbs. I haven't seen the 46" offering but I'll bet it's a beauty. Taylor might have a profile picture to post, I'll ask him. I think the Awt. 50 would make a super slim rifle, but be a bugger to hold.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2011, 11:25:39 PM by Vomitus »
Logged

Daryl

  • Guest
Re: Rice Barrels
« Reply #13 on: October 20, 2011, 10:25:10 PM »
He's gone guiding - should be home tuesday.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »