So if the gun builder does not do too good of a job in neutralizing the acid left by the Aquafortis the dye applied afterward may not be the color desired. The same might be true if the builder gets carried away in neutralizing the Aquafortis with a strong caustic rather than a mild caustic.Bill K.
Quote from: Mad Monk on November 26, 2008, 07:07:41 PMToo little....too much? How can we test it? I probably err on the side of using too much BS in water.
I then used a bakin soda wash to kill the AF and set it aside to dry. The next day I reviewed the stock in natural light and was taken back by the green hues radiating from the wood.
I see in one of the posts about the use of a heat gun.When I read the thing in Calvin Hetrick's book, "The Bedford County Rifle and Its Makers" I saw his description of how Dolfus M. Drake stained with the nitrate of iron stain.He heated the stained stock over the forge fire. That would give more radiant heating of the wood's surface versus heating by hot air.I have an idea that a heat gun that blows hot air might dry the stain solution out before it really gets a good chance to work on the wood.So you might want to try some other source of heat.When I was still doing stocks with nitrate of iron I would apply the stain solution and then use one of the large heating units on the wife's kitchen range.Now of course she knew the script here and as soon as I hauled out the bottle of stain she would simply go do a little shopping to get out of the house.I did find that I could not set the heating unit on the max bright red coil setting lest I burn some of the fine edges of the stock. But at the medium setting it gave good control over the heating of the wood and the changes in the color patterns brought about by the heating.
Alright, I'll say it...if you stain properly with AF, you don't need any other kind of stain on top of it.