Author Topic: Shape of the buttplate & shooting  (Read 12304 times)

Number19

  • Guest
Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« on: July 01, 2012, 06:58:13 AM »
I'm referencing two rifles in Whiskers "Gunsmiths of York County"; and for angle, 0 degree is at 3:00 and 90 degree is at 12:00.

The rifles on pages 76 and 80 both have butt plates with minimum curvature. But the rifle on page 76 has the toe of the plate slightly left of the top, meaning the angle is slightly less than 90 degrees. The rifle on page 80 has the top of the plate further to the left than the toe, with the angle maybe as much as 95 degrees.

My question concerns the shouldering of the rifle when shooting. Does the curvature of the butt plate make a difference? Is this something which is readily apparent? I don't know how easy this is to describe in words, but I'd appreciate it if someone could make an attempt? Thanks.
George

Bentflint

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2012, 04:50:46 PM »
You are talking about "pitch". It can effect felt recoil, muzzle flip and quick follow up or 2nd shots. Look at modern full auto mil guns, they have neutral or 0 pitch and almost no drop in the comb. With modern shotguns, this can be a big deal as well. Enough of that.

In a muzzleloader, not such a big deal. Unless it's a big bore with heavy recoil. If it feels right, as a rule, it is. It also effects what the gun looks like. A curved or flat plate has more to with time frame or where it was made "historically". The best way to know what's best for you is to hold and shoot as many long guns as you can before you pick a stock style.

Does that help?

Daryl

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2012, 07:04:56 PM »
ditto and
This one's very nice shooting.


The early Pennsylvania rifles are pretty much all very comfortable to shoot - especially the E. Marshal rifle. The later rifles developed into excessive drops at the heel with heavily cupped & narrowed butt plates which increases rise on firing and cheek smacking by the comb seems a common and nasty trait with many.

Offline hanshi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5335
  • My passion is longrifles!
    • martialartsusa.com
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2012, 12:06:47 AM »


Here's a picture of an early, Rev War era Pennsylvania rifle and a later post war Pn rifle.  Both handle recoil well due to the stock architecture.  With calibers much above .54 the earlier gun will certainly be more pleasant to fire.  The early butt plate is also wider as well as being flatter.
!Jozai Senjo! "always present on the battlefield"
Young guys should hang out with old guys; old guys know stuff.

Number19

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2012, 06:13:31 AM »
You are talking about "pitch". It can effect felt recoil, muzzle flip and quick follow up or 2nd shots...In a muzzleloader, not such a big deal. Unless it's a big bore with heavy recoil. If it feels right, as a rule, it is. It also effects what the gun looks like. A curved or flat plate has more to with time frame or where it was made "historically". The best way to know what's best for you is to hold and shoot as many long guns as you can before you pick a stock style...
Yes, and thanks. I'm still a couple of weeks away from receiving my first BP; I went with early stock design knowing it would handle well based on my experience with modern arms. As opportunity presents I'll have to shoot other styles.

northmn

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2012, 05:11:40 PM »
The most comfortable and best designed rifles for shooting were the English sporting rifles.  They were large bore and built to handle recoil.  You not only have to look at the butt plate but the stock design as well.  Some of the "Roman nose"  styles can be tricky to make fit with a heavier recoiling rifle for instance.  For a 25 squirrel rifle it really does not matter much, but for a 58 or larger it matters a lot.  Even a 45 that does not fit can hurt if loaded for deer.  I have found that the cheek piece is also critical for fit as I have some replicas (Brown Bess) that wanted to give me a small acorn on the cheek.  I sold the Bess and built a 12 bore that was a pleasure to shoot, by accomodating the drop and cheek fit.  I will not even talk about the plains rifles that were built with the highly curved butt plates that were designed to be shot off the arm. Some like them, which is their right, but I consider them a abomination.  Some of the original Hawkens were offered with a "shotgun buttplate" option.

DP

Offline Bob Roller

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9687
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2012, 05:26:49 PM »
A friend of ours built a Hawken for himself using a set of accurately drawn to scale prints and did a wonderful job. His father liked the gun and wanted one made but without that "ridiculous crescent butt plate".
The gun was made with a shotgun butt plate and it looked fine and still does.
The man that made these two guns is Sid Estep,a superb machinist and craftsman whose work was rejected by the muzzle loading crowd and in so doing,another fine craftsman said,Never again". He made some nice locks with my help and the best Hawken style steel butt plates ever offered. He now does mould making and specialty machine shop jobs and will not have anything to do with muzzle loading again.

Bob Roller

Offline Roger Fisher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6805
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #7 on: July 03, 2012, 05:30:27 PM »
A friend of ours built a Hawken for himself using a set of accurately drawn to scale prints and did a wonderful job. His father liked the gun and wanted one made but without that "ridiculous crescent butt plate".
The gun was made with a shotgun butt plate and it looked fine and still does.
The man that made these two guns is Sid Estep,a superb machinist and craftsman whose work was rejected by the muzzle loading crowd and in so doing,another fine craftsman said,Never again". He made some nice locks with my help and the best Hawken style steel butt plates ever offered. He now does mould making and specialty machine shop jobs and will not have anything to do with muzzle loading again.

Bob Roller
This makes one wonder what in the H   happened ??? A couple of unappreciative people does not a 'crowd' make.... :o

Offline Bob Roller

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9687
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2012, 08:34:27 PM »
More than a couple. Sid and I both had problems with people calling and saying how they could get a cheaper lock and it was about that time I got hooked up with the German market that didn't let $2 stop a project dead on the bench. Sid was by then getting involved with other jobs as did I between lock orders from the Rheinland. I liked easy projects like transmission bushings,water pump shafts and other parts for major classis cars. There have been others that have had the same experiences that Sid Estep and I had but that is another story.

Bob Roller

Offline D. Taylor Sapergia

  • Member 3
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #9 on: July 04, 2012, 07:50:01 PM »
Bob, I'm so glad you weathered the storm and persisted.  I have several examples of your work, and consider it of the finest quality.  There will always be those who refuse to pay for quality, but the converse is also true.
D. Taylor Sapergia
www.sapergia.blogspot.com

Art is not an object.  It is the excitement inspired by the object.

northmn

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2012, 06:53:54 AM »
There are a certain group of "experts" out there that seem to consider themselves guardians of the purity of muzzleloading or buckskinning.  They kind of turned me off also, as most of their study seemed to come from Walt Disney movies and Hollywood.  You would think that everything in the hand produced age was actually mass produced.

DP

Offline Chris Treichel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2012, 10:21:19 PM »
To the point of the style of buttplate... how much do we know about folks back then shooting off the arm, the shoulder and the cheek? And then in these days are some of these "comfort" issues due to shooting the wrong way with a certain type of stock/ buttplate combination?   

Daryl

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2012, 04:12:52 AM »
We know for a fact, hooked butt plates (plains rifles) can not & could not be shot from the shoulder pocket (off the top of the pectoral musclewith arm foreward, elbow high), but were designed and must be held either out where the bottom hook slides between the chest wall and the upper arm, or out on the arm to be even remotely comfortable. The deeper hooks with shorter-in-height butts, like the Bedford county rifles needed to be shot further out on the arm than the Hawken style of rifle.  This much is obvious - add to that modern man is more robust/obese/overweight/taller/heavier than most people of our past and those styles which showed poor comfort THEN, are really bad now.  We also know even when held fairly close to the chest, but under the arm as needed, the hooks of the larger rifles kick badly.just plain hurt with larger than about .58 calibres. That is the reason I sold my S.Hawken all those years ago, because of how badly it kicked me with the loads that shot well.

After switching to the English style rifle, the butt that is held on the chest as a shotgun butt and as all of the heavy rifles are held today when properly stocked for the shooter, felt recoil was reduced to manageable levels. Even heavier loads were easier to shoot and I discovered that style was the fastest in target acquisition to boot. No wonder, of all the styles of rifle butts and stock shapes, the English pattern survived until today. Thus those of us who shoot the larger bores, recognise the attributes of this design and applaud those of old who discovered and developed it.

Offline Roger Fisher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6805
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #13 on: July 07, 2012, 05:51:26 PM »
Good ol Leon Buck who beat the drawers off of most other shooters back in the late 70's shot a straight stocked .45 caliber half stock and held her out on his upper arm.  For some odd reason he decided to go to a .58 and held the beast the same way.  He developed a nice gooseegg on his upper arm and a $#*! of a flinch.  He lasted maybe 3 or 4 months and dropped out of the 'game' since he could no longer hold his status in the ranks.......we were sorry to see him go since he was a $#*! of a shot and a lot of fun drunk or sober./....I like the lancaster style of rifle comfy to shoot (sorry Al)..  My smoothbore has the typical wide flatish butt plate and love to shoot her.  My .47 chunker has a narrow butt plate and I should have used a wider plate when I built her, however, she paid for herself a few times over (so far) My charge being 85 3 f goex at the 60 yard distance so I can live with her. 

So, bottom line  is beware the narrow hard curved plate depending on caliber and charge. 8)

Daryl

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2012, 06:02:58 PM »
Good ol Leon Buck who beat the drawers off of most other shooters back in the late 70's shot a straight stocked .45 caliber half stock and held her out on his upper arm.  For some odd reason he decided to go to a .58 and held the beast the same way.  He developed a nice gooseegg on his upper arm and a $#*! of a flinch.  He lasted maybe 3 or 4 months and dropped out of the 'game' since he could no longer hold his status in the ranks.......we were sorry to see him go since he was a $#*! of a shot and a lot of fun drunk or sober./....I like the lancaster style of rifle comfy to shoot (sorry Al)..  My smoothbore has the typical wide flatish butt plate and love to shoot her.  My .47 chunker has a narrow butt plate and I should have used a wider plate when I built her, however, she paid for herself a few times over (so far) My charge being 85 3 f goex at the 60 yard distance so I can live with her. 
So, bottom line  is beware the narrow hard curved plate depending on caliber and charge. 8)

northmn

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2012, 08:54:06 PM »
There is a possibility that a few of the originals were made to be shot off chunk or someother position than offhand as the whole rifle was very heavy (some were over 1" and 45 caliber and 42" or longer)  The buttplate is part of a whole setup in stock design.  A wide buttplate helps to spread out recoil but too short can also cause problems as it is harder to hold the rifle firmly to the shoulder.  The check rest area needs to have proper cheek clearance so that the rifle recoils away from the cheek instead of into it.  The English design had the top of the comb parrallel with the bore to accomplish this.  I even modified a modern O/U shot gun to this design when it shot high and belted me in the cheek.  My 12 bore fowler was shot a few times before I finished it to achieve my desires.  The crescent buttplates lasted into the cartridge era and were given credit for making rifles like the 95 Winchester in 405 to have fearsome recoils.  Another rifle to look at is the design of the long range ML rifles.  The Gibbs as reproduced by Pedersoli, has a shotgun buttplate.  Why do you think they are called shotgun buttplates?

DP

BONES

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #16 on: July 08, 2012, 05:14:47 PM »
First is it historically correct.  Second is how does it hold when shooting.  I have been bulding a Hermann Rupp going on 2 years. (taking my time so as not to make mistakes)  I was told that the curve of the stock makes it one of the more difficult rifles to shoot.  I was told the only other style harder is a Bedford. (my current favorite rifle)  I have been shooting rifles with a lot of drop it is second nature and I have difficulty shooting a modern rifle with minimal drop to the stock.  It is just a matter of learning to shoot what you have.

Candle Snuffer

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #17 on: July 12, 2012, 05:11:02 AM »
When I started building muzzle loaders (for myself), my first thought (and it still is), I'll build it to fit me and my needs.  I doubt any of my rifles are historically correct, and I also expect there is less then one tenth of one percent of folks in this hobby that actually knows what is or isn't historically correct, give or take a percentage point.  Then again, perhaps the rifles I have built are historically correct given the number of parts that were gathered in places like St. Louis during the height of the muzzle loading trade there during the fur trade days and Oregon Trail days.

If it works for you, or your customer,,, build them what they want,,, provided it's made of wood and metal and has a side lock... ;)

northmn

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #18 on: July 13, 2012, 07:56:35 PM »
Wqht is historically correct in hand made rifles??

DP

Offline Chris Treichel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #19 on: July 13, 2012, 09:16:54 PM »
What time period, location and style of shooting (target, hunting, military) are you asking about?

Offline heelerau

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 666
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #20 on: July 14, 2012, 01:05:28 AM »
I have often wondered why the later stlye rilfles have a more hooked but plate, including the plains rifles. I find my Lancaster rifle handles faster inspite of it much longer length than my plains rifle. My plains rifle certainly holds real steady, and inspite of its.50 ball and 90 grs of fffg the recoil is not to bad. The lancaster holds just a steady and is more comfortable to shoot with the wider but  plate.  It seems to my uneducated eyes an almost retrograde step going to a crescent style but plated.

Cheers


Gordon
Keep yor  hoss well shod an' yor powdah dry !

Daryl

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #21 on: July 14, 2012, 02:19:08 AM »
By jove, he's got it!  Just kidding, heelerau - well,not really.  The shotgun butt shape of the early guns is much more comfortable to shoot, especially with larger calibres.  A Hawken butt in .58 or .62 can become nasty with heavy loads. The shotgun butt became popular again in the US with hevier recoiling rifles in the ctg. era, which is why big Winchesters were available with both- the gun buyer's choice. In England, they never lost favour as most of their rifles were of heavy calibre and the hooks never caught on in the first place.

The hooks seemed to become most prominant with smaller calibres, woods shooting around trees, or perhaps to assist in holding the gun when on horseback - all of these reasons, suggestions, or excuses have been suggested. How much is speculation or just plain guessing and how much is fact, I don't know. Hind sight is usually the most accurate, but sometimes it would be nice to have some original facts,ie: documentation to support our speculation.

SPG

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #22 on: July 14, 2012, 05:51:21 PM »
Gentlemen,

Buttplates and stock designs were different to fit specific requirements and were rarely done for no good reason.

The mistake that is made is assuming that all designs were used for the same purpose and would fit different body types.

A light caliber target rifle shot from the plank will be much different than a heavy caliber hunting rifle shot quickly from the shoulder. Care must be used with a shotgun buttplate to insure that it is placed in exactly the same place when target shooting. Changing position on your shoulder/arm even a small amount will change the impact of the shot. Many old Schuetzen rifles had buttplates that were so tight they could only be fit to the arm in one place. This insured consistency in head-set and recoil. I believe that many original rifles were used as target rifles first and hunting rifles second, hence the "target" features such as crescent plates and fine sights. We don't appreciate the popularity of "shooting at the mark" back in the days before we had our modern distractions.

Fortunately for me my body style appreciates the Bedford, both offhand and from the rest...

Steve

Offline Chris Treichel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #23 on: July 16, 2012, 08:37:14 PM »
I will second that about those curved buttplates.  I have handled many Schuetzen rifles that have such a construction as to almost lock everything touching it into a specific place to include a cheekpiece that rises up custom fit to perfectly align the eye with the diopter, trigger guard that ensures the same finger placement to include a place to rest your thumb. 

how many different ways are there of using a stock? Some I can think of are:

Cheek stock/ over the shoulder shot like a cross bow: old style German straight rifles only the cheek makes contact with the stock. First style of rifle stocks. Great for shooting off horseback or at fast moving targets.  You can shoot efectively anywhere you can look without moving the rest of your body. Need to shoot light loads.

Wide butt plates: into the nook of your shoulder like English shotguns and rifles great for heavy loads. Also great for prone shooting.

Narrow curved and hooked buttplates: Off the arm. Great for target loads and offhand shooting. Curvature of the stock also shaped for shooting off the arm stock drops down towards buttplate.

Hooked stocks like camel guns: clamped under armpit against side of body? I have no experience with this have only seen these in pictures and museums.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2012, 08:39:16 PM by Chris Treichel »

catman

  • Guest
Re: Shape of the buttplate & shooting
« Reply #24 on: July 22, 2012, 07:21:39 PM »
These are very pleasent to shoot, my little Antonio Zolli 50 cal Rifle