Over in "Contemporary", there is a critique going on about a Mike Brooks rifle, which has early architecture, and a great look.
Here's the topic:
http://americanlongrifles.org/forum/index.php?topic=22431.0In this discussion, the 'humped breech' is discussed, and it inspired me to bring out some photos from various guns to further conversation on the subject. The 'humped breech' is an early feature which faded out in America in the late 18th Century. I can be found on some American pieces, and in plenty of European works. Most American Barrels don't have this kind of flare. Is this stylistic, or thought to be a factor of safety to keep the breech from blowing?
Below are some examples of 'humped breeches'.
British 'Coach Gun' breech. Barrel flares up at breech, tang is filed/shaped curving downward into wrist. Note straight English lock, similar to Chambers.
Jaeger from the Met, upward flare continues from barrel to tang, then the downward curve is all in the tang.
Same Met Jaeger, lockside. Note the straight lock, and huge 'hump' in the breech.
Another jaeger, note similar flare of barrel and tang, in conjunction with a 'banana' lock.
I thought you might like to see these pix, and the locks and architecture that goes along with these great flared barrels.
Do visit the link above, where Mike has offered his rifle over for critique. This is a great thread, interesting feedback, and a learning experience for all who participated.