One a great scale of hardness.
But what does it represent in the spectrum of things?.
770 is compared to what, is like saying a #$@* rolled in powdered sugar is a jelly doughnut
Just being funny here to make a point.
Is this scale of Hardness taken from a Quarter Sawn piece of sycamore?.
Quarter Sawn will be the only way I'd make a stock from a lot of woods, mainly because of any curl, flecking patterns that come from the wood, as well as it just being a more stable piece of wood to be used for a stock.
As I stated yesterday, because the over all of said stocks were made one way, this was merely for production, as I also pointed out, I would make the barrel channel and wall a bit thicker. I've seen curly maples and walnut forearms flop around like a wet noodle.
more wood to the forearm belly and sides, isn't going to change the appearance
So why keep building them the same way, sure most of them have held up over time, but to use a piece of Sycamore per sé and have a little more wood to create a firm stock.
Sycamore Quarter Sawn for anyone who has seen it is absolutely beautiful and in my Opinion would make a great stock.
I'm working on gather a few blanks and should have them in a few weeks in which I'll start creating a Flintlock and a percussion 42" swamped Barrel early Traditional Jacob Hawken in a .54 Caliber. I'll post as I go for you all to see.
As well I will research the strength of Quarter Sawn Sycamore @ the wrist of said stock and post my findings.
Unless I'm missing something, this is the critical point of stress with any wood, and must be straight grained throughout or risk being damaged.
The Hardness test is not a true measure with in the discussion of this conversation, merely because it's created using a piece of flat cut wood, pressed with a ball bearing to measure the amount of #'s of pressure it can take until the fibers are damaged, or penetrated.
Again, "not" from a piece of Quarter Sawn wood.
I will test to see what the difference is, if I can not find any results on the internet.