This may be a bit off the question at hand, but I'm curious about the mention of original European parts being INVESTMENT cast. Do you have any information or documentation that allows this conclusion to be drawn?
Thanks,
Jim
I'm relying only on one piece of information, and it is a conclusion made, rather than a period reference. Hence it is still unproven, but the conclusion of a qualified and experienced student of the techniques used on originals. We've all seen very fine and complex sand castings.
Eric Kettenberg, in his article in the August 2003 Muzzle Blasts, The Anatomy of an Austrian Hunting rifle, Part II, "It is clear that a wooden pattern was used as the casting master, since the inside surfaces of the buttplate retain traces of wood grain and chisel markings, which were clearly transferred to the casting. The buttplate is uniformly about 3/32" in thickness. After examining all the furniture on this arm and considering the remarkable detail and sharpness of the castings, I conclude that all the brassware was investment cast (or wax-cast). This is further reinforced by the fact that there is absolutely no residual sand texture on any of the brassware, and in fact I cannot find any flaws either."