Man, congrats. I have way much more appreciation for halfstocks, albeit I realy agree, that properly made fullstock has an unique apeal.
I have only one point-the curves around the entry thinble are, compared to all other curves on the rifle, a bit abrupt. The transitions could have been done a bit longer, so than smoother. But maybe the grain didnīt allowed for sleekr curves here.
I agree with the wedges, they realy "sticks out" now for the eye. Maybe itīs just the digiphoto, which usualy gives higher contrasts to some parts. Iīm sure that after catching/being given some patina, it will be almost invisible.
The other two abovementioned "complains" I really apreciate as a great plus-I like the long smooth curved transition to the upper wrist way better, as well as the fact that you have more wood to hold the pushback upon firing. As well I like @!*% much the buttplate angle, which allows you to set the rifle right into shoulder, without getting punished by the upper butt on recoil. Also, it allows you to try to shoot longer range very comfortably. Or shoot prone without hurting your neck. No way from my point of view of the buttstock being too sleek, as well as the forestock not being too fat.
The weight and mass of the rifle is at least for the eye (and physicaly probably also) ballanced to the back, with light front at least half. Svelte, but well build front with well-build, but realy not fat back and butt-like ideal mix for something else...