Micah,
Acer has pretty much hit the nail on the head. But there is much more to then that.
All things being equal, a cutting/tapping fluid will produce a much better thread. If you could
look at the surface finish of completed threads you would find a smoother surface finish
on threads produced with a fluid meant for that purpose. A very smooth cut thread will be
stronger then a rough cut one.
But also the size of the tap matters a lot. If you look at an 8-32 tap, it should have a GH
number after it. The most common would be a 8-32 NC GH3. The 3 after the GH means the
tap is .0015 over the Pitch Diameter. A GH1 would be .0005, a GH2 .001. A GH5 is .0025.
Years ago I had to test 8-32 threads in 5/32 CRS. The purpose was to find out if cutting fluid
had a influence on the integrity of the thread. I tapped 10 holes for each fluid. Then an inch
pounds torque wrench was used to see what it took to strip the female threads. All tapping was
done with a Procurnier Tapping Head and a GH3 tap. Fluids were Kerosene, Motor Oil, Tap-Magic and
Moly-D. Also used a brand of water soluble cutting fluid which was used on our CNC machines.
The taps were changed out after they ran the 10 holes.
Well the force to strip was the worst with Kerosene and Motor Oil. Next was the water soluble.
The best was the Tap-Magic and Moly-D. Moly-D having a slight edge over the Tap-Magic.
So how much better, statistically between 25 to 30% better.
So if I were to tap a hole in a lock plate I'd use a high quality tap, and a high quality tapping
fluid. Simple as that.
Mike C.