Author Topic: Ready to build, kit or plank?  (Read 11772 times)

whetrock

  • Guest
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #25 on: October 18, 2013, 01:23:14 AM »
Louie,
Here's a link to an Armstrong in the ALR virtual library.
http://americanlongrifles.org/forum/index.php?topic=5565.0

The 11th photo from the top shows the top side of the buttplate, and helps illustrate the important detail you were explaining.
Whet
« Last Edit: October 18, 2013, 01:25:41 AM by Whetrock (PLB) »

Offline Paddlefoot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #26 on: October 18, 2013, 01:24:16 AM »
So its like a tapered tenon with a stud sticking out of it?
The nation that makes great distinction between it's warriors and it's scholars will have it's thinking done by cowards and it's fighting done by fools. King Leonidas of Sparta

galamb

  • Guest
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #27 on: October 18, 2013, 01:47:56 AM »
Toyed with the idea of building an Armstrong so I vacuumed up whatever I could as far as specs that would help with a build.

As far as barrels, this is what I found - not much beyond caliber and length, but may help you decide:

(flint) 470 bore diameter, 46" octagonal-to-round barrel. 18" from breech are some nice turnings separating octagonal-to-round (No Further details).

(flint) 44-1/2" full octagon 48 Cal. rifled and flared bbl signed "J. Armstrong" (meaning tapered? or swamped??)

(flint) 43 5/8" .485 smoothbore - straight 15/16"

(percussion) .36 caliber, 43 1/4-inch octagonal rifled barrel

(percussion) OAL..........58"----------BBL .......42 11/16----------cal.40 ----breech.....31/32  tapers to 7/8 flares to15/16 (swamped or just filed that way???? - how much change before it's considered swamped? - my questions/thinking here)
 
(percussion) Rifle has a 41-3/4" full octagon 44 Cal. rifled bbl signed in script "John Armstrong"

(percussion) .45 caliber, 43" octagonal barrel


(percussion) .45 caliber, 42 1/2" barrel 31/32" across the flats

If you are looking for an "off the shelf" lock, the Siler is close and can probably be made to look really close with a bit of work.

I also found the Chambers Golden Age percussion looks pretty close (almost a perfect match for a Christian Hawken) and again, could maybe be "tweaked" a bit if you are looking for something that you don't have to totally build yourself or have built..

Offline GANGGREEN

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #28 on: October 18, 2013, 01:54:07 AM »
Thanks galamb, that's interesting info. 

galamb

  • Guest
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #29 on: October 18, 2013, 02:03:16 AM »
I do have some pictures to go with the ones I posted up above. They were "scavenged", not the kind you would take if you were trying to pattern a build, but if interested I could throw some up, or email to anyone interested.

Offline louieparker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 831
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #30 on: October 18, 2013, 02:09:22 AM »
Whetrock, Thanks .   I had forgotten those photos.. what's the old saying about a picture and a thousand  words....LP

galamb

  • Guest
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #31 on: October 18, 2013, 04:04:12 AM »
Looked through my collection of pictures and of the 8 rifles I have and only one did NOT have the insert in the butt plate.





So you could probably go "without", but that is probably "rare"...

whetrock

  • Guest
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #32 on: October 18, 2013, 04:51:45 AM »
This rifle with no iron insert (the second of galamb's photos) has been for sale this weekend. The experts at James Julia's Auction house suggest that this is the earliest signed Armstrong known. Here's a link to their site, which includes more photos.
http://jamesdjulia.com/auctions/view_lot_info.asp?lot=2346-346
« Last Edit: October 18, 2013, 04:52:19 AM by Whetrock (PLB) »

galamb

  • Guest
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #33 on: October 18, 2013, 05:19:50 AM »
Yes, the other thing I noticed on the one with no insert was that Armstrong's signature was engraved right into the barrel, not in the "more typical" brass insert that he used on all the other examples I have...

Offline bama

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2164
    • Calvary Longrifles
Re: Ready to build, kit or plank?
« Reply #34 on: October 18, 2013, 03:04:01 PM »
Louie, I knew you would know how the iron heel was done, thanks for the info. That early rifle in the auction is an awesome rifle. I may have to consider something along that line one of these days.
Jim Parker

"An Honest Man is worth his weight in Gold"