while i hear you bob .
we dont have ,,,well i should say , the vast majority dont shoot at ranges back here .
Often times those that do , do so at public ranges which consist of little more then a gravel pits with a burm and some post driven in to as to hang targets on ..
I could literally drive I bet 300 miles and have a chose of 2 ranges . Both of those are in boise . One is an indoor range and the other a out door range . The out door range is a club range and the indoor range is a business that sells guns . That would exclude trap clubs of which there are many .
So
just about any wide spot with a good back stop , well away from people will do. when it comes to events , well lets just say NMLRA doesn’t hold the power , reputation or consideration back here that it does back east . frankly IMO not a bad thing either . But that’s another topic for another day and since we no longer talk politics on this site it would be impossible to discuss the topic wouldn’t it .
as to being un safe or not ? well that depends really . most certainly you wouldn’t want one on a hunting gun . but for target guns , im seeing more and more set up just that way .
frankly , i dont see it any more unsafe then someone who over adjusts their double set to the point where if a mouse !@#$% 20 ft away , the gun will go off Or for that mater a pistol where you cock it then have to fumble to push a set trigger forward .
in either case the set up can be just as un safe .
IMO what is unsafe is relying on a ½ cock notch in any way . Frankly the gun should not be cocked until such time as the barrel is down range or a person is preparing to shoot with the muzzle in the direction they intend to shoot But then that’s my opinion
Again while I don’t prefer that set up , thinking on the safety option of that set up , I would have to say I have seen far more double set go off accidentally a lot of times as people are raising them to their shoulders .
So really both types can be just as unsafe when not set up properly be it setting the trigger prior to cocking or setting the trigger after cocking .
don’t forget that even a properly set up double bar , double set , can be set , cock or un cocked .
You do realize that people do it both ways .
The single set could be set before cocking but the
first movement of the hammer from the resting position would trip the trigger and it would go into half cock
on its own.
ok ill have to admitt here that you lost me with that .
the only way i can see that happening is if the trigger bar is higher then the bottom of the sear hole . IE when the sear drops down in the cocking movement , it comes in contact with the trigger bar .
however if the trigger bar is even with or lower then the sear hole , there is no way that the sear can contact the trigger bar in any way as it cant go lower then the sear hole .
which brings us back to Dons trigger issue .
if i understand him correctly , when the lock is cocked it wont catch the full cock .
In my mind im seeing the trigger bar being up into the sear hole . With the trigger spring being stronger then the sear spring , the sear cant provide enough leverage to push the trigger bar down enough so as to let the sear engage the full cock . IE the trigger bar has enough resistance to hold the sear out of the full cock notch even though it may or may not allow him to cock to the ½ cock .
If that’s the case then there are two options that I can see . Both of which we talked about
1) reduce the resistance of the trigger spring
2) reduce the height of the trigger bar to such a point that it allows the sear free movement through the cocking arch. Which is what greybeard suggested .
Now as to a set trigger needing a tumbler with a fly . that’s not necessarily true
Now its been some 25 years but I recall a European sporting rifle coming into the MOI that had set triggers but did not have a fly on the lock . I want to say the name on the loc was Alexander Williams ,,, Welcomes or something of the sort . As I recall the rifle was in very poor shape . What I do clearly remember was that we at first thought that the lock had been changed at some time because there was no fly on the tumbler .
Ironically the lock would not engage the half or the full cock notches unless you set the trigger prior to cocking . When that happened the trigger bar set below the sear hole and did not obstruct the sear travel through the cocking arch
This was also a single bar type of double set . What we finally figure out was that the lock was indeed the original lock . How it worked was that do to the weight of the trigger spring once the trigger was set and the lock cocked and the front trigger pulled , the weight of that spring not only disengaged the sear from the full cock , but it held the sear clear of the notches just as a shooters finger does when shooting a pivoting trigger type. IE there was no need for a fly on the tumbler as the sear did not ride along the tumbler at all when the lock was fired .
I remember thing how odd that was as up until then I had never seen a set trigger on a rifle , without having a lock with a fly on the tumbler