Maybe my thread would have been more appropriately titled, “Blessing or Curse.” I enjoy doing what I do but I would like to learn to take a more “workmanlike” approach. That was part of the thinking process behind the post. I was hoping to learn what a more workmanlike approach looked like. I am going to start another mountain rifle and I would really like the internal work to be commensurate with the external work. Maybe even try and inlet the lock and the triggers fully assembled, aka Mark Silver.
David
Inletting ala Mark Silver freaks me out!
Honestly, I admire those crisp interior inlets, but don't have time to do them. I spend far more time on the edges of the inlet where the fit is visible. As long as the part doesn't flop around after it's pinned or screwed down it should be good.
Generally, the gun you build will never be taken apart anyway other than the lock. We all build guns to our own standards.Some of us are very meticulous, some not so much. As long as the final presentation is good it really doesn't matter how rough the bottom of the triggerguard inlet is.
Probably more attention should be paid to archetecture than inletting than can't be seen. Just my opinion of course. My opinion is of course based on the fact that I pay my bills with this sort of stuff. If I were a hobby builder than all my inlets may be different..... I have all the bottoming files and chisels, just don't ever use them. It all works, If you can't take the gun apart and look....or even if you could, what difference does it really make?