Just took a look at Remington and they list their standard LOP for modern guns at 13 1/4 - 13 1/2" depending on model (and have a kit to extend the pull) on the (adult) size stocks - some 12" LOP on Youth rifles.
So that's an example "modern" LOP.
On many of the rifles I have patterned my own builds from, 13 1/2" seems to be a "very common" LOP for a Golden Age era rifle - so seems to have been a good "typical" LOP whether now or a couple hundred years ago.
Now there is always a difference between your measured LOP and what "feels right". You note you used a "gauge" and determined your LOP. I will say that's the LOP that "feels good" to you, not your actual LOP.
To find that you measure from the crook of your elbow (inside of the arm) to the inside of the knuckle on your trigger finger (so middle joint on the finger).
Like you, I am 6'1" and my sleeve length is 34". My "measured" LOP is 15 3/4" but even in a T-shirt I would find that length "uncomfortable" - I "prefer" 14 1/2" and build my rifles as such.
The one gun that I just love is my single shot, 20 ga H&R, exposed hammer shotgun. Guys I shoot with commented (a number years ago) that I was a better "shot" with that than all my other guns/rifles. So I measured the LOP and it is 14 1/2" - so that's "MY" LOP regardless of what the measurement says.
I have noted on a number of pre-shaped (but not inlet) stocks sold by Track that some of them state a 15" LOP - on their pre-inlet offerings where the butt plate is inlet, the LOP drops to between 13 1/2 - 14" depending on the (model).
The modern LOP you mentioned is almost identical to the 13 1/4" LOP on the M1 Garand.
I did not know the average LOP on original Golden Age rifles was 13 1/2" and found that VERY interesting. THANK YOU! Considering the height of the average man then was only about 1/2" to 3/4" shorter than it is now, that makes sense.
The way you describe to check the LOP in the emboldened part above is how one uses the Brownell's Trigger Pull Gauge. What might be confusing is it says "Trigger Pull and Drop Gauge," but it really means Length of Pull and Drop Gauge. One sticks one's finger through the hole as you mentioned and slides the sliding part to the inside of the arm as you mentioned. Hard to tell by the link, but here it is:
http://www.brownells.com/gunsmith-tools-supplies/measuring-tools/stock-l-o-p-and-drop-gauges/pull-drop-gauge-prod387.aspxAfter reading what you wrote about your arm length and "playing" with the gauge more, it's possible for me to get a reading similar to the LOP you describe, but it feels too long as it does for you. (Someone gave me this gauge maybe 20 years ago, but I have rarely used it as I mostly work on modern military guns with a fixed stock length.)
The drop from the plane of the barrel to the top of the buttplate on my flinter is about 3 1/2inch and about 5 3/4 inch to the center of the buttplate where I measure the LOP on it. The LOP on that rifle is 13 1/4" the same as on the M1 Garand. Maybe because of the drop I would not want the LOP to be any longer as it already feels long enough?
Taking what you mentioned about reducing the length of pull from a gauge to what feels good, better explains why the finished Chambers Rifle felt so good. It is listed at 13 1/2" so it sounds like it winds up shorter when the buttplate is fit.
I really appreciate you typing that out. Now it doesn't sound so strange to me.
Gus