I consider the patent breech "safer".
It may have been initially designed to speed ignition (by some accounts) but I personally don't care if rifle A has an ignition time 3 milliseconds faster than rifle B.
I consider it a "must" (patent breech) particularly in thinner walled barrels. The liner or drum is installed into the plug, not through the barrel wall which may be quite thin.
Even on a heavier walled barrel, because the plug channel/chamber is "less than bore size" there is still "more meat" for the liner or the drum to fasten in to. And when it comes to safety, MORE is ALWAYS better, particularly with a caplock where you are essentially setting off a pipe bomb about 4" in front of your right eye.
For that reason alone I will live with the "greater chance of fouling" and all that goes along with that.
There is a number of styles of patent breeches out there, some may be better than others.
Here's some that you may come across:
PERCUSSION TYPES (compared to the "typical" drum style)
FLINT TYPES (compared to the liner through the barrel wall)
Of course, if we all agreed about everything there would be but a single rifle available
All my rifles, flint or cap, have a "chambered" patent breech and I personally do not see any disadvantage, difficulty in cleaning, fail to fire, channel/chamber bridging or any of the other (noted) issues with a patent breech. And not to be confused with "hooked" breeches which allow easy removal for barrel cleaning. With one exception (a Hawken Plains/Mountain rifle), I use "fixed" breeches.