I’ve known for some time that one of the New England fowlers I have has had something down the barrel. I didn’t know what, but a guy has expressed an interest in the old thing, so I thought I should find out for sure just what’s down there. This is an 1820/30 fowler, originally full stocked curly maple and flint, but now a broken fore stocked percussion now.
Poking down there with a long drill brought out something sort of soft, not cloth, but maybe paper. But poking like this wasn’t going to bring out whatever it might be, so I gave the breech plug a shot of WD-40, let it soak a bit. The breech on this fowler is hefty, measuring 1.110” across the flats, so I carefully but firmly clamped the barrel in my vice. This barrel already has plenty of vice marks on it, but I was careful not to add to them. While the WD-40 continued to soak in I searched for the 18” Crescent wrench I knew I had, well, someplace. This length of wrench seems to work well for this sort of thing. It’s not so long that you can easily twist off the back end of the breech plug, but long enough to get a stubborn one to start to turn, and then work it out, if it’s going to come out. As most of these plugs do, this one has tapered threads much like a modern pipe thread.
The first picture is the plug. It’s .670” in diameter at the base and .625” diameter at the end, and .575” long. It’s threaded with about 8 or 9 threads per inch. It looks like it might have leaked a little pressure by the first 3 threads, but that the last two seemed to have held without leaking.
Once the plug was out I shined my flashlight into the breech, and saw what looked like old powder. I should have got a picture of it, but didn’t. So, I stared picking at the powder and got a little out, then a little more, and then wondered if it’d be possible to punch the whole load out through the muzzle to sort of keep the load intact. Maybe it’s just me, but I like to explore old things like this, to see how it was loaded and with what. So I found about a 12 inch long piece of ½” diameter ramrod doweling, put a wadded up piece of patching material up against the powder, then the end of the stick, then tapped the other end with a smallish hammer. Nothing moved at first, but after a couple small whacks the load started creeping out towards the muzzle!
So this is what we have. The 2nd picture is the over shot wad just out of the barrel, next is the shot load then the over powder wad, and finally the powder charge.
By the way, the bore measures .610”.
For some spec’s on this load, the powder is mostly very fine, almost dust now. The intact pieces look about like 3F size. As is, the powder charge weighs 42 grains on my scale.
The shot charge has 67 balls, about .110” diameter, and altogether weigh 130 grains on the same scale.
Interestingly, when I pushed the first wad out of the barrel, I noticed a small printed letter on it, and I thought sure, it’s newspaper! So once I had the entire load pushed out, and being curious, I couldn’t just let it go, so limbered up my fingers and carefully unfolded the first wad, and then the second. Pretty much right away it was obvious that the wad wasn’t an early loading as I noticed the print ‘Phone 449’! More unfolding showed that this part of the paper was the Theater section and the date Thursday, Nov 16., and also some movies. One was titled ‘Stolen Plumage” with Henry Murdoch, neither of which I’d ever heard of before, but a quick internet search turned it up easily as a one reel comedy released in Oct 1916! One of the other movies listed was titled ‘Here and There’ and was also released in Oct 1916. A calendar search shows that Thursday, Nov 16 happened in 1916, and not again until 1922, so things are pointed toward the wadding being from a 1916 newspaper!
Yikes, 1916! This gun was made about 1820/30! But the last time it was loaded was sometime after Thursday, November 16, 1916!
Loaded with less than 50 grains of powder, loaded light for a bird or maybe a rabbit. Or loaded light (see the last picture) due to the 6 inch long repaired split midway down the barrel!
I don’t know, but don’t doubt that the gun was used like this, as this type of repair had been in use for at least a couple hundred years. But no way to know for sure at this point.
I thought some of you guys might be interested in seeing this.
John