Author Topic: Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?  (Read 4204 times)

Offline Rolf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1764
  • There's more than one way to skin a cat.
Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?
« on: May 06, 2015, 08:30:03 PM »
Made and installed the triggers and triggerplates. Got tangbolts installed. Used fillister heads. Going to counterbore the tangs. Got the lockbolts installed.
The side plates are to short for the locks. Going to lengthen the front ends with a piece of brass.

Is this type of sideplate supposed to be inlet or does just lay on top of the wood?







Best regards
Rolf
« Last Edit: May 06, 2015, 08:31:08 PM by Rolf »

Offline Keb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1193
  • south Ohio
Re: Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2015, 09:05:25 PM »
I just lay them on top but I'm lazy. I'd put money on them just being on top. They are widest at the base so you could never get a good inlet. But that's just my opinion of which I can not back up with anything but stubbornness.

Offline E.vonAschwege

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3118
    • von Aschwege Flintlocks
Re: Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2015, 09:35:03 PM »
They are supposed to be inlet, but very shallow - somewhere around 1/16" or so.  Looking at a lot of fine European guns with extravagant sideplates, they are all very thin material, and inlet shallow. 
-Eric
Former Gunsmith, Colonial Williamsburg www.vonaschwegeflintlocks.com

Offline D. Taylor Sapergia

  • Member 3
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12671
Re: Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2015, 11:06:36 PM »
I'm not seeing any inletting 'draft' along the edges of those plate.  If you are to inlet them, you will have to file the edges to create a tiny taper 1/16" high.  Then, you can inlet them.  If they are flat backed, and with no taper, they were made to lay on the surface, but this may not be historically correct.
D. Taylor Sapergia
www.sapergia.blogspot.com

Art is not an object.  It is the excitement inspired by the object.

Offline smart dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7014
Re: Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?
« Reply #4 on: May 07, 2015, 01:26:46 AM »
Hi Rolf,
They should be inlet, absolutely!  It is not that hard to do with tiny chisels.

dave
« Last Edit: May 07, 2015, 01:27:43 AM by smart dog »
"The main accomplishment of modern economics is to make astrology look good."

Offline Acer Saccharum

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19311
    • Thomas  A Curran
Re: Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2015, 05:37:46 AM »
You do indeed have to file a draft to inlet the plates without gaps. This will keep you off the streets for a couple of nights, anyway.
Tom Curran's web site : http://monstermachineshop.net
Ramrod scrapers are all sold out.

Offline Hudnut

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 231
Re: Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2015, 04:38:54 PM »
As far as altering the length of the sideplates is concerned...
I converted a tradegun serpent sideplate for a flintlock gun to one for a percussion gun - the version which uses an Enfield rifled musket style lock.
Replace the front portion with the splice at the shoulder behind the hole.  Use silver braze.  The joint will disappear because of the step.

Turtle

  • Guest
Re: Are these side plates suposed to be inlet?
« Reply #7 on: May 10, 2015, 10:09:26 PM »
 I use serpent side plates like these on some fowlers. I file a draft for a 16" inlet so the fit looks tight.
                                                           Turtle