Author Topic: Early English Fowler  (Read 4310 times)

Okefinokee Outlaw

  • Guest
Early English Fowler
« on: September 26, 2015, 11:39:37 PM »
Would walnut or maple of both be historically correct?

Offline J. Talbert

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2309
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2015, 12:24:01 AM »
English walnut would be most appropriate.

Jeff
There are no solutions.  There are only trade-offs.”
Thomas Sowell

Offline rich pierce

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19540
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2015, 01:08:56 AM »
Depends on what you are trying to represent, an imported fowling piece or a colonial piece made in the British style.  There were British style fowling pieces made in the New York City, Long Island sound, Connecticut area which were most often stocked in maple and they had carving sales which were quite elegant yet (I think) distinct from English guns.  As noted the majority of English imports were stocked in English Walnut.

The confusion on this topic comes from suppliers who make "English fowler kits" with maple as the first choice, and English walnut rarely offered at all.  Don't try to learn anything from most catalogues.
Andover, Vermont

Offline smart dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7018
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2015, 01:29:35 AM »
Hi,
What do you mean by early?  First half 17th century, second half 17th century, 1st half 18th century, 2nd half 18th century?  Most will be English walnut but figured and burl maple was popular on high-end guns during the last decade of the 17th and 1st decade of the 18th centuries.

dave
"The main accomplishment of modern economics is to make astrology look good."

Okefinokee Outlaw

  • Guest
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2015, 01:48:07 AM »
1750-1770.  Built in the colonies would be fine.  I just don't want to use a wood that was not often used.

Offline bob in the woods

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4555
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2015, 02:41:01 AM »
Built in the colonies...1750's....could also use cherry.

Okefinokee Outlaw

  • Guest
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2015, 02:34:19 PM »
Thanks gents.

Offline Mike Brooks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13415
    • Mike Brooks Gunmaker
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2015, 03:46:32 PM »
1750-1770.  Built in the colonies would be fine.  I just don't want to use a wood that was not often used.
Built in the colonies it doesn't matter.
NEW WEBSITE! www.mikebrooksflintlocks.com
Say, any of you boys smithies? Or, if not smithies per se, were you otherwise trained in the metallurgic arts before straitened circumstances forced you into a life of aimless wanderin'?

Offline James Rogers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3164
  • James Rogers
    • Fowling Piece
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2015, 05:09:51 PM »
1750-1770.  Built in the colonies would be fine.  I just don't want to use a wood that was not often used.
Built in the colonies it doesn't matter.
And also ceases to be an English fowling piece, early, middle or late. ; )

Offline rich pierce

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19540
Re: Early English Fowler
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2015, 05:57:52 PM »
1750-1770.  Built in the colonies would be fine.  I just don't want to use a wood that was not often used.
Built in the colonies it doesn't matter.
And also ceases to be an English fowling piece, early, middle or late. ; )

The curse of the kits.
Andover, Vermont