Caution -
The following is regarded Politically Incorrect amongst muzzle loader shooters.
Consider reading December, 1985 ... Entire patent breech and threaded portion of barrel separated, striking the shooter in the head . . . notch at the root of the thread concentrated stresses to about 1-1/2 times normal level, in the thin barrel wall. Lost his left eye, had brain damage, with impaired hearing and balance. This was a .45 caliber rifle, barrel 13/16" across flats with 11/16" breech threads...
Scot, I'm glad you raised this topic: awhile back, I'd made a trade for an unfired Cherokee with both .32 & .45 barrels, for The Bride's first ML, and she asked me to do some minor modifications to make it look a little more traditional, and pleasing to her eye.
So, since the topic at hand is the Seneca breech plug, and the Cherokee is, from what I'm told, virtually identical, I have a related question:
what in the heck is the ~1/4" dia plug on the off-side of the (Cherokee) breech plug, in the body of the plug (not forward in the threaded area of the plug, so can't be for indexing; this is in the chamber area of the body of the plug)? Could/would this be a "blowout" plug, against an incidence of catastrophic failure, designed to direct failure and gases away from the shooter, or is it something else entirely?
Let's go back in time to the early 1970's. A magazine was started by the late John D.Baird to call attention to the dangerous
practices of over stressing these cast breech plugs and the T/C was notorious for over tightening them so the top flat on the plug
would match the top flat of the barrel. I remember that terrible incident about the one that blew out and the brain damage to the
shooter.This type of thing was fueled by the fallacy that enough black powder couldn't be loaded to blow one of these guns up.
In addition to the over tightened breech were the problems created by using a 50 caliber plug in a 45 caliber barrel and snagging the cleaning
patch. This company knew NOTHING about muzzle loaders and marketed a potential trap. To those who paid attention,Baird's magazine
called "The Buckskin Report"was a real help. It is my understanding that T/C was incorporated with a low level of liability but a lawyer
should address that question.I think it goes to the level of payment in the event of a blown gun and a consequential lawsuit.
The threaded plug in the left side of the plug is NOT a blowout plug but is a cross drilling to facilitate cleaning if needed. Many of the best
English long range rifles have cross drill breech plugs but they aren't obvious and are not removeable and are frequently covered with
engraving. I have seen X rays of these plugs showing that type of construction.In these English guns it was part of a design to prevent very
high pressures on the base of the nipple.
Some of the T/C plugs if shot with artificial powder would get a rust ring going between the gap in the barrel threads and the shorter
length of the plug and there were some separations due to that high level of corrosion.
No one believes this was a deliberate attempt to market and poor product but lack of knowledge and not consulting with those of us who
did know brought about these low and high level disasters.
Bob Roller