Rich, You are correct . With the shoulder that is now used , I agree , you don`t want a gap for moisture and fouling build up. My point about the originals was that, those guys weren't machinists ,they were 18th century barrel makers and, what they did WORKED. I`m sure someone will comment that they weren't facing litigation if they failed which, may be true. But I`m sure that if they were having breech failures they wouldn't be in business long ,or perhaps been thrown out of a guild . Much of the parts that we have today ,came about during the revival period of muzzleloading , and we are blessed to have them available. But a lot of it was approached by modern machinists with modern machinist training and mindset which, in some cases was good ,but other things got over engineered, ie. deeper threaded breechplugs which threw the lock alignment out for certain rifles . The old smiths and gunstockers had to be efficient and they did have everything to lose if they messed up too. Maybe they didn't shoulder them as much as today because they didn't have to.