The difference in us is I have no bias against flintlocks.
And I have none against caplocks.
I took exception to your blanket statement...
All the rest isn't evidence to support your claim that caplocks are more reliable - it is anecdotal and contains nothing that could be used to assess reliability. You were better off sticking with your claim of 250+ shots without a misfire...
Let's backtrack a bit. I read you post and said "wrong in so many ways". I was talking about everything you said. I picked the part about me personally to show you were wrong. You made it sound like I was scared. I did my best to explain I wasn't. I didn't have time to go over everything you said. I had stuff to do. I'm just getting back now.
So, our disagreement is which ignition system is more reliable. This can be hard to prove, but we can look at history. The military has always used what they thought was the most reliable, accurate, guns. They used the caplock after it came out. Even though they had to fiddle with caps they still chose the musket cap guns. They never went back to the flintlock.
I don't find keeping the caps dry much of a chore. I did find keeping the powder dry in the pan. Especially, 4F that seemed to such moisture from the air so easily. I'm not sure how you guys avoid that? I was constantly changing the pan powder, because it was turning into sludge so fast. I used a cows knee, but it didn't prevent the powder from getting wet. I was doing something wrong, but I never figured out what.
Plus, as I said. My era is the fur trade/mountain man. Even though the Hawken wasn't widely used, it was used and that's my choice. The Hawken of those times was a caplock. So, that's what I use. Although the Lyman Deerstalker i'm using now can hardly be called a Hawken. It's a compromise I had to make because of some medical problems.
So, that's it. To the OP. Both ignition systems work if you do all you should do and do it every time. Dry and clean is always your goal. Good caps and flints are mandatory. Have fun.