Author Topic: Leman vs. Hawken  (Read 3331 times)

Offline Old Ford2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1102
Leman vs. Hawken
« on: June 13, 2018, 02:55:42 PM »
What were the design differences between the Leman and Hawken.
Visually they seem much the same.
Admittedly the Hawken could come with more select wood.
I have studied both, but I can't really point out a major difference.
Leman produced many more guns than the Hawken boys, and for a longer time.
Fred
« Last Edit: June 13, 2018, 02:59:06 PM by Old Ford2 »
Never surrender, always take a few with you.
Let the Lord pick the good from the bad!

Offline Hungry Horse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5565
Re: Leman vs. Hawken
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2018, 04:33:48 PM »
I think the major difference between the two is that Hawken guns would fall into what we currently call custom, and semi-custom guns. Leman made a few custom guns, but the majority of his production was in a full blown manufacturing facility. Leman had contracts with fur companies, and the government, while the Hawken brothers did not.
 These two companies really don’t compare at all. Hawken guns used a lot of technology seen in fine British firearms of the period, while Leman guns were of a more basic design.

 Hungry Horse

Offline Frank

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: Leman vs. Hawken
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2018, 09:28:04 PM »
Major differences are:

The Hawken has a hooked patent breech and a long tang with 2 bolts going thru the wrist and into the trigger plate vs a plain plug breech with a drum and nipple for the Leman.

Hawken has double set triggers vs a plain single trigger for the Leman.

Minor stuff:

Hawken has barrels wedges vs barrel pins for the Leman.
Hawken has steel/iron furniture vs brass for the Leman.

Stock architecture is different between the 2 rifles, and the Leman is a much easier rifle to build.

These are the most obvious things that I have observed.

Offline stubshaft

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Re: Leman vs. Hawken
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2018, 09:41:29 PM »
Major differences are:

The Hawken has a hooked patent breech and a long tang with 2 bolts going thru the wrist and into the trigger plate vs a plain plug breech with a drum and nipple for the Leman.

Hawken has double set triggers vs a plain single trigger for the Leman.

Minor stuff:

Hawken has barrels wedges vs barrel pins for the Leman.
Hawken has steel/iron furniture vs brass for the Leman.

Stock architecture is different between the 2 rifles, and the Leman is a much easier rifle to build.

These are the most obvious things that I have observed.

Thanks Frank, I have wondered at time about that myself.
I'd rather die standing, than live on my knees...

Offline rich pierce

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19561
Re: Leman vs. Hawken
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2018, 10:20:09 PM »
J&S Hawken rifles were made before Leman got started I believe.

As stated above Hawken plains rifles were more sophisticated and expensive than Lehman’s and tended to weigh more and be steel mounted.
Andover, Vermont

Online Bob Roller

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9708
Re: Leman vs. Hawken
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2018, 10:25:31 PM »
What use are double set triggers on a rifle with poor sights?My BEST shooter was an
Alex Henry barreled Whitworth semi military match rifle with a superb,finely tuned 4 pin
Brazier lock and a single trigger.I had the sights as well.I am thinking the set triggers were
to compensate for locks that were mediocre at best.
The Leman was not a quality rifle but it worked for the occasional shot at a deer.
The Hawken was much better quality in construction as far as the strength in the grip
was concerned but the lock quality was about the same no matter who made it.

Bob Roller

Offline Mtn Meek

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
    • GRRW Collector
Re: Leman vs. Hawken
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2018, 11:13:50 PM »
What were the design differences between the Leman and Hawken.
Visually they seem much the same.

Fred

What Hungry Horse says is true as far as it goes, but I don't think it addresses the root of your question about the "design differences".  To better understand the design difference, it helps to understand more about the background of the principals in the two firms.

Henry Leman was born in Lancaster, PA and apprenticed to Melchior Fordney, a talented Lancaster gunsmith.  Leman then went to work for George W. Tryon in Philadelphia as a journeyman gunsmith for a few years, after which he opened his own gun shop back in Lancaster in 1834.  Leman was trained and worked in the Lancaster school of gunmaking, except for the few years he spent with Tryon where he probably learned more about building rifles on a large production scale than any particular style.

Even though Leman built a very large number of guns (According to the 1850 census, Leman had 34 employees and produced 5,000 gun barrels and 2,500 complete guns that year) of different types and styles, including NW Trade Guns, the rifles he is most associated with are classic late Lancaster pattern rifles with the triangular shaped butt stock.

The top rifle is an original Leman squirrel rifle that has been cutback to half stock and barrel shortened.  The bottom rifle is one of Jack Brook's Leman Indian rifles.


Jacob and Samuel Hawken were born and grew up in Hagerstown, MD and most likely learned gunsmithing from their father Christian Hawken, Sr.  They would have learned to build rifles in the style of the Maryland school around Hagerstown.  In fact, a rifle of that style survives that is marked "C. & J. HAWKEN", probably built jointly by the father, Christian, and son, Jacob.  Another of the same style is marked "S. HAWKEN".  Several other rifles exist of the same style that were built by brother, uncles, and cousins of Jacob and Samuel.

Maryland school rifles built by Jacob, Samuel, and Hawken relatives.


Jacob work for several years as a journeyman gunsmith at Harper's Ferry before going to St. Louis around 1818.  Samuel arrived in St. Louis in 1822 after having lived and worked in Xenia, Ohio since 1816.  Jake and Sam formed their famous partnership in 1825, apparently after the death of Jake's former partner, James Lakenan.

Once in St. Louis, the Hawken brothers were free of the confines of working in an established school as dictated by the market back in Hagerstown, but they still had to satisfy the needs and desires of the customers around St. Louis and points west.  A lot has been written over the years about the possible influences that guided the Hawken brothers in the development of their classic mountain rifle.  Many have noted the similarities to English sporting rifles as Hungry Horse pointed out.  Others point to the Harper's Ferry 1803 and the time that Jake had worked there.  Some see a strong influence of southern mountain rifles that were brought by people moving to Missouri from Kentucky and Tennesssee, particularly in Hawken full stock rifles (see picture below).  Hanson thought that James Lakenan and guns produced at the Virginia Manufactory had some influence.  In reality, all of these probably played some part.

Most peoples' image of a Hawken rifle is the classic S. Hawken plains rifle of the 1850's, but that is the fully evolved late period Hawken rifle.  Prior to Jacob's death in 1849, the brothers had made a number of different styles and types of rifles.  Based on Charles E. Hanson, Jr's research in the records of fur trade companies, the majority of these may have been full stock rifles.

Unmarked full stock rifle attributed to J&S Hawken


Sublette-Beale J&S Hawken circa 1835-1843


Sporting rifle restocked from HF 1803 parts - Maker unknown


Kit Carson's last Hawken - classic late S. Hawken


If you see any design similarities between some of the Hawken rifles pictured above and the Leman rifles, its probably in the architecture of the butt stock and "Lancaster" triangular shape.  I wouldn't place too much significance on this.  That shape is what made Lancaster pattern rifles so popular for so long, because it's "pleasing to the eye".  By the mid-1800's, a lot gun builders around the country had adopted it.  Even lever actions rifles of the later part of the 19th century used that shape of butt stock.  It just became the fashion.

Others have posted above about the construction details and differences between Leman and Hawken rifles, so I won't bother to repeat those details.
Phil Meek

Offline Old Ford2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1102
Re: Leman vs. Hawken
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2018, 06:37:45 AM »
Thank you all for a very educational response.
Fred
Never surrender, always take a few with you.
Let the Lord pick the good from the bad!