i have found L and R quality control to be all over the map. one of my 15 yr old flints (durs egg) i have no complaints, not perfect but good. the latest lock purchased (Dimick) was so bad (in my estimation) i sent it back for a replacement which is only marginally better.
Like Mr. Roller says, sloppy tolerances on the tumbler/bridle holes....and i just hate the "gi-normous trench" they grind in the plate for the little sear spring tit. also the as cast post for the fly is a joke. the locks just seem to be an assembled kit, which require much de burring,tweakin and polishing and in my case a new forged sear spring. that said, Land R is pleasant enough to deal with.
best
kw
Before Bill Cox's ownership of L&R lock they were available as a kit but
with inexperienced people trying to make a lock there were more problems
than with a completed lock.The biggest problems were from the foundries
that the parts came from.Quailty control was nearly zero and L&R** got a
bad reputation thru no fault of their own. I talked to or maybe talked AT
a foundry owner or foreman and he was blunt and rude. He said "WE do production
and no quality control".Sort of like the car industry before the imports gave our makers
a richly deserved bloody nose and lesson in making cars.
Plates,frizzens,cocks,hammers are the externals of a lock but the lock itself is on the
back side of the plate and I want nobody but myself in charge of that part and it will
stay that way.
**There NO intent on the part of L&R at any time to make any inferior locks but being
completely reliant on an indifferent supplier is a guarantee of aggravation and problems
none of us want.
Bob Roller