Compared to a percussion rifle, say the drum type style ones so common today on factory and custom guns, are flintlocks easier/faster to clean?
To me, it would seem so. My thinking:
The percussion gun must have the nipple removed as well as the cleanout screw (if applicable) after each session. The flintlock has no parts that need be removed. Both the caplock’s nipple and cleanout screw can easily become lost in the field if they are dropped. Also cleaning and drying the long flash channel in the percussion drum thoroughly is a chore in my experience. The nipple is awkward to clean as well, and when done, they must be reinstalled and the threads properly lubricated to prevent seizing, each and every time.
The flint gun just had the bore to be cleaned and the very short vent to be cared for. Granted the flint gun has more parts to the lock, but they’re all on the outside and with my method of cleaning I rinse the bore twice with hot water, draining on the last rinse with the gun pointed down so it can slowly drip drain, meanwhile I clean the lock and exterior barrel surfaces before scrubbing the bore. This allows excess water to drain out and lets the fouling soften up over the course of about 10 or 15 minutes, which gives enough time to detail the lock and the rest of the piece.
Neither gun needs the lock to be removed after every shooting in my experience, but the fact that you don’t need to take any parts off the flintlock in the field, clean the cramped drum of the caplock or the nipple, just makes flintlocks easier and quicker to clean and service.
Anyone agree or disagree?