So then is the S'mister claiming it is falsely represented? Is it even"old"? Is it in the "style of" the claimed maker?Whatever... it is a pleasant looking firearm. One might think it would carry a higher pre-auction estimate.
They do state:William Schreckengost (1821-1894) is part of the extended line of Schreckengost (also spelled various other ways including Schreckengosh)Has anyone seen this before or know if this is true?Fleener
This one turned out to be an auction sleeper. It's a great example of his work.
I’m stunned. The signature is faked. Not his hand and misspelled Shreckengosh. Never thought I would see the day
Interestingly, I just came across this document signed by William's son Lincoln and his T looks like an H. Makes me wonder.