I'm looking at buying a rifle and I've narrowed my choices down to around 2...
One has a Chambers Large Siler. The other an L&R Bedford.
I like the rifle with the L&R Bedford, but as I understand it, L&R locks have a reputation for lower quality and reliability... Or at least they did at some point.
Have they improved? Or would I be happier with the rifle with the Large Siler?
Mike
In the 1970's L&R had major problems with foundries that delivered substandard parts
and one in particular told L.C.Rice that
We do PRODUCTION,not quality control". They NEVER intended to offer an inferior lock
or anything else to the muzzle loading builders/shooters of that time frame but had a
bad time dumped on them by their suppliers that care for nothing except their own
sales.Today there have been improvements made in their line of locks and while they
still have a way to go,they are honest and I remember the time I over paid them for
some lock parts and Bill Cox caught that error 3 months later and sent me a refund for
about$14.00 and at one time they were the ONLY people that had my personal debit card
number for fast pay. I did use their external lock parts and have had NO problems reported
due to their parts.Both L&R and Chambers are owned by fine people and I am glad to have
them as friends.
Bob Roller