Hi, I just joined your good forum, after talking to Dennis about my quest for a Gillespie rifle.
We were a long-time Mills River family. I’m related through Isabell Gillespie (daughter of John, sister of rifle maker Matthew) who married Lawrence Sitton. Her son Phillip L Sitton married Nancy Caroline Allen. My gg-great grandfather is buried in the Sitton-Gillespie cemetery, along with several other Allens. When I was young in the early 70s, we would sometimes go to the graveyard and dad would tell stories about their lives. The family lore is that some of my ancestors worked "on rifles at an iron works" in Mills River.
My interest in black powder started at a young age in NC, I had my first rifle at about 12 or 13. But over the years I got interested in other things and guns, moved out West to NM and AZ and raised a family. Finally, in the past 30 years my wife has tried to find out more about our Mills River Allens (And McCalls). The past 3-4 years we went to Hendersonville several times doing research. Now, I want a Gillespie rifle!
Dennis helped and now I have a line on a modern made one, that should be very close to the real thing. I'm excited, and will post more as it evolves. The two questions I had at first were will I be happy with walnut instead of maple (I'm not an expert of mountain rifles). I'm now convinced. And will an "aged" finish be something I would want. Its funny but in my gun collecting experience, the opposite was sometimes done with old Colts and Winchesters. An original, aged finish is "restored" which I always advise against, and will not buy a restored gun. But with flintlocks, it is different. I'm not buying an original (though would love one one day), so the whole thing is restored! So I'm leaning towards an aged finish. My 82 year old father said he would get the aged...so it will feel more like an heirloom. Glad to be here.