I have finished the standing breech and it is nice and tight, but I found some major design flaws in my Le Paige pistol project. In retrospect, should have drawn plans with the parts in scale 1:1 before starting. I did not think I needed to since I had the origial snail to copy.
This is the lock I had planned to use. When the hammer is in the fired position and placed in contact with the nipple, the hole for the lock bolt conflicts with the standing breech. If I move the lock rearwards to avoid this, the hammer cannot reach the nipple.
A second problem is the mismatch between the shape of the snail and the shape of the lock plate. The next picture shows the wreck that donated the barrel. The original lock plate has a gentle slope that follows the curve of the snail. The other lock plate has a much steeper curve.
The “new” lock plate will make a weak spot between the snail and the upper corner of plate with very little wood. It also looks strange.
I need to discuss possible solutions and hope for advice and inputs. These are the options I have thought of:
1) Get a new lock that fits the snail. Problem with that, is I would have to design and make the lock from scratch. I do not think I have the skill for this.
2) Make a new plug/snail that fits the lock. This plug would have to be without a standing breech. To avoid conflict with the lock bolt, the length of the plug can be max 18mm long.
The plug I made is 23mm long without the standing breech.
3) Use the barrel for a flintlock pistol. This is the easiest solution and right now the most tempting.
Best regards
Rolf