Dillon,
I don't know that I can give much specific information, as this is not really my area of expertise... as if I have one... but I would like to throw a couple of ideas into the kettle.
I would urge you to go through the tables of contents of back issues of
The Museum of the Fur Trade Quarterly (MOFTQ), which you can access via a link on
this page. All of the back issues are still in print, and can be ordered from the MOFT. They have had a number of articles which may be of interest over the years. Volume 5 (from 1969), with all four issues bound into one volume, has a couple of articles which may be of interest. Volume 5, No. 3 has a good piece about gun worms (which is the proper name; "tow worm" is a modern term). Of even more interest is Volume 5, No. 4, which has a well-illustrated four-and-a half page article entitled "
Notes on Canadian Powder Horns." One interesting point made in that article follows: "
Canadian horns seem to have been generally attached to separate braided cords instead of the straps used to carry the Kentucky horn and bag as a single unit" (p.9). This is a little detail that may not get much attention.
I would also suggest that you look through this paper which was produced by reenactors at Fort Ticonderoga:
Milice. I understand you are not a reenactor, but you have expressed an interest in authentic equipment. I'm the same way. Anyhow, this paper, which will pop up as a PDF file, does have some good suggestions for authentic gun-related gear. Well worth a look.
And, while this image may not be
entirely appropriate to your question, it is just too good to pass over:
Entitled
Un Vieux de '37 ("The Old One of '37"), by Henri Julien (1852-1908), this 1904 painting depicts an old militiaman answering the call to arms during the 1837
Patriote Rebellion. I love this image. The central character, believed to be one Edmond-Joseph-Édouard Mignault, carries a military musket rather than a
fusil de chasse, but his accoutrements appear to be what you would expect of a civilian. He has a large horn with a lot of white on it, which I understand was preferred. There have been some lively discussions recently concerning "artistic license" in old paintings, but I believe this one holds up well under close scrutiny. You can get more information here about it here:
150 Years. If you click the image in that link, the picture enlarges and also provides you with a virtual "magnifying glass," so you really can scrutinize it closely.
Good luck with your quest!
Notchy Bob