I use 2F on everything over .50
Tony
Thanks Tony, Does the 2fg create extra fowling? Thanks, Jerry
I have not found that, but others say it does. I've been using 2F in most of my guns, since 1973.
In the .40 and .45, there was no difference in the fouling that I could tell, between 3F and 2F.
In the .69 rifle, way back in the late 80's, I used 3F up until about 90 gr. If I used heavier loads than that with 3F, it burnt the patches, while 2f never did, no matter what the load,
right up to 165gr. I assume that was due to the 3F igniting/burning with a faster pressure rise, perhaps before that large ball obturated. It is still a mystery, to me, but I do not
like 3f in the large bores. I actually get higher velocities with 2F, using identical loads. Tested that just a few years ago, with Taylor (my bro) using his chronograph. The difference
wasn't much, but was there.
That higher vel. with 2F, was in the .69. This does not happen in smaller bores, as to get the same speed in the .40 and .45, using 2F, I had to increase the charge of 2f by 10gr. over the 3F load. Then, the poi and velocity was identical. I was also using a slippery lube, LHV, which also has an effect on velocity.